Bypass Surgery: Indication, Timing, and Effectiveness

  • W. Richard Marsh
  • Thoralf M. SundtJr.
Conference paper


While the value of extracranial to intracranial (EC-IC) bypass operations in conjunction with planned major cerebral vessel occlusions for the treatment of aneurysms and tumors remains well-recognized, the usefulness of such surgery for any atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease is controversial. Results of the EC-IC bypass trial have led to categorical statements by the principal investigators that there is no indication for EC-IC bypass for any atherosclerotic disease of the anterior circulation. Revelations regarding large numbers of patients operated outside the trial by participating centers cast some doubt on these conclusions. It is necessary to get clinical and follow up data on the patients undergoing superficial temporal to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass at participating centers but who were withheld from the study to assess the meaning of the cooperative study. Our own experience with bypass includes 415 STA-MCA anastomoses for atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease in 403 patients, seven superficial temporal to superior cerebellar artery anastomoses, 41 occipital artery to posterior inferior cerebellar anastomoses, and 146 saphenous vein grafts, atherosclerotic disease, and aneurysms of the anterior and posterior circulations. Current indications, operative technique, and analysis of results are to be presented.


Vein Graft Posterior Circulation Saphenous Vein Graft Anterior Circulation Superficial Temporal Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barnett HJM, et al. (1987) Are the results of the extracranial-intracranial bypass trial generalizable? N Eng J Med 316:820–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    EC/IC Bypass Study Group (1985) Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischémie stroke: Results of an international randomized trial. N Eng J Med 313:1191–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldring S, et al. (1987) The extracranial intracranial bypass study. N Eng J Med 316:817–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Relman AS (1987) The extracranial-intracranial bypass study. N Eng J Med 316:809–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sundt TM, et al. (1982) Interposition saphenous vein grafts for advanced occlusive disease and large aneurysms in the posterior circulation. J Neurosurg 56:205–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sundt TM, et al. (1985) Results, complications, and follow-up of 415 bypass operations for occlusive disease of the carotid system. Mayo Clin Proc 60:230–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sundt TM, et al. (1986) Saphenous vein bypass grafts for giant aneurysms and intracranial occlusive disease. J Neurosurg 65:439:450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sundt TM, et al. (1987) Was the international ramdomized trial of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass representative of the population at risk? N Eng J Med 316:814–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whisnant JP, et al. (1985) Long-term mortality and stroke morbidity after superficial temporal arterymiddle cerebral artery bypass operation. Mayo Clin Proc 60:241–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Richard Marsh
    • 1
  • Thoralf M. SundtJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurologic SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations