Advertisement

Outcome of Aggressive Aneurysm Treatment with Early Operation and Adjunct Nimodipine in a Strictly Defined Swedish Population Served by a Small Neurosurgical Unit

  • Jan Hillman
  • Claes von Essen
Conference paper

Abstract

Recently, much interest has been focused on improvement of the overall outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Clinical work has demonstrated that surgery performed early after aneurysmal bleeding yields equally good or better results than does delayed surgery on a number of selected survivors from the early disasters characterizing this disease [3]. Furthermore, attempts to treat manifest brain ischemia during the course of SAH by hemodynamic manipulations [4], or to prevent its occurence by use of the calcium entry blocker nimodipine, seem promising [1, 8]. The structure of the medical care system in this country permitted almost every patient in a strictly defined population of 934 000 people, who survived long enough after aneurysm rupture to be transported, to be seen in this center. Furthermore, 86% of all patients were seen within 24 h post-SAH. This provides us with a unique opportunity to roughly evaluate the overall outcome of aneurysm bleeding obtained by the therapeutic principles presently applied, and permits a good understanding of the causes of clinical deterioration in a number of patients.

Keywords

Cerebral Aneurysm Aneurysm Rupture Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Psychological Distur Aneurysm Bleeding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Auer LM (1984) Acute operation and preventive nimodipine improve outcome in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 15:57–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ausman JI, Diaz FG, Malik GM, Fielding AS, Son CS (1985) Current management of cerebral aneurysms: Is it based on facts or myths? Surg Neurol 24:625–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flamm E (1986) Timing of aneurysm surgery 1985. Clin Neurosurg 33:145–158Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kassell NF, Peerless SJ, Durward QJ, Beck DW, Drake CG, Adams HP (1982) Treatment of ischemic deficits from vasospasm with intravascular volume expansion and induced arterial hypertension. Neurosurgery 11:337–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kassell NF, Torner JC (1983) Aneurysmal rebleeding: A preliminary report from the cooperative aneurysm study. Neurosurgery 13:479–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ljunggren B, Brandt L, Kågström E, Sundbärg G (1981) Results of early operations for ruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg 54:473–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ljunggren B, Säveland H, Brandt L, Uski T (1984) Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Total annual outcome in a 1.46 million population. Surg Neurol 22:435–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ljunggren B, Brandt L, Säveland H, Nilsson P-E, Cronqvist S, Andersson K-E, Vinge E (1984) Outcome in 60 consecutive patients treated with early aneurysm operation and intravenous nimodipine. J Neurosurg 61:864–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ropper AH, Zervas NT (1984) Outcome 1 year after SAH from cerebral aneurysm. J Neurosurg 60:909–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Hillman
    • 1
  • Claes von Essen
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurosurgical Service, Department of SurgeryUniversity HospitalLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations