Comparing Life Histories



Traditional interpretations of life history diversity view reproductive rates primarily as consequences of species differences in body size or some other key limiting variable. A more useful approach for understanding life history diversity is to combine optimality theory with comparative data on fertility and mortality schedules, which are likely to vary with habitat. Differences in body size are important in so far as they influence those schedules.


Life History Brain Size Horseshoe Crab Mouse Lemur High Metabolic Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Law R (1979) Ecological determinants in the evolution of life histories. In: Anderson RM, Turner BD, Taylor LR (eds) Population dynamics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 81– 104Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonner JT (1965) Size and cycle: An essay in the structure of biology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harvey PH, Read AF (1988) How and why do mammalian life histories vary? In: Boyce MS (ed) Evolution of life histories: Pattern and process from Mammals. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 213–232Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huxley JS (1932) Problems of relative growth. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Western D, Ssemakula J (1982) Life history patterns in birds and mammals and their evolutionary interpretation. Oecologia 54: 281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindstedt SL, Swain SD (1988) How and why do mammalian life histories vary? In Boyce MS (ed) Evolution of life histories: Pattern and process from mammals. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 93–105Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harvey PH, Read AF, Promislow DEL (1989) Life histories variation in placental mammals: Unifying the data with the theory. In: Harvey PH, Partridge L (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 13–31Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sacher GA (1959) Relationship of lifespan to brain weight and body weight in mammals. In: Wolstenholme GEW, O’Connor M, C.I.B.A. foundation symposium on the lifespan of animals. Little, Brown and Co., Boston, pp 115–133Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Economos AC (1980) Brain–lifespan conjecture: A re-evaluation of the evidence. Gerontology 26: 82–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bennett PM, Harvey PH (1985) Brain size, development and metabolism in birds and mammals. J Zool (London) 207: 491–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bennett PM, Harvey PH (1985) Relative brain size and ecology in birds. J Zool (London) 207: 491–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Millar JS (1977) Adaptive features of mammalian reproduction. Evolution 31: 370–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Millar JS (1984) The role of design constraints in the evolution of mammalian reproductive rates. Acta Zool Fen 171: 133–136Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Case TJ (1978) On the evolution and adaptive significance of post-natal growth in terrestrial vertebrates. Q Rev Biol 53: 243–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sacher GA (1978) Longevity and ageing in verebrate evolution. Biosci Rep 28: 297–301Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McNab BK (1980) Food habits, energetics and population biology of mammals. Am Naturalist 116: 106–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McNab BK (1983) Energetics, body size, and the limits to endothermyj Zool (London) 199: 1–29Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McNab BK (1986) Food habits, energetics and reproduction of marsupials. J Zool (London) 208: 595–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hennemann WW (1983) Relationship among body mass, metabolic rate and the intrinsic rate of increase in mammals. Oecologia 56: 104–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hofman MA (1983) Energy metabolism, brain size and longevity in mammals. Q Rev Biol 58: 495–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge Universtity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Calder WA (1984) Size, function and life history. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Swihart RK (1984) Body size, breeding season length and life history tactics of lago-morphs. Oikos 43: 282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harvey PH, Pagel MD, Rees J A (1990) Mammalian metabolism and life histories. Am Naturalist (in press)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trevelyan R, Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1990) Metabolic rates and life histories in birds. Func Ecol 4: 135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1983) The functional significance of variation in body size among mammals. In: Eisenberg JF, Kleiman DG (eds) Advances in the study of Mammalian Behavior. American Society of Mammalogists, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harvey PH, Zammuto RM (1985) Patterns of mortality and age at first reproduction in natural populations of mammals. Nature 315: 319–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sutherland WJ, Grafen A, Harvey PH (1986) Life history correlations and demography. Nature 320: 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saether BE (1988) Evolutionary adjustment of reproductive traits to survival rates in European birds. Nature 331: 616–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bennett PM, Harvey PH (1988) How fecundity balances mortality in birds. Nature 333: 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Promislow DEL, Harvey PH (1990) Living fast and dying young: A comparative analysis of life history variation among mammals. J Zool (London) 220: 417–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cole LC (1954) The population consequences of life history phenomena. Q Rev Biol 29: 103–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sade DS, Cushing K, Cushing P, DunaifJ, Fingueroa A, Kaplan JR,Lauer C, Rhodes D, Schneider J (1976) Population dynamics in relation to social structure on Cayo Santiago. Yearbook Phys Anthrop 20: 253–262Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28: 1140–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    LeBreton JD (1977) Multinomial method to estimate survival rate from bird band return: Some complements to the age–dependent method. Biometrie-Praximetrie 17: 145–161Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lakhani KH, Newton I (1985) Estimating age-specific survival rates from ringing recoveries: can it be done? J Anim Ecol 52: 83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Anderson DR, Burnham KP, White GC (1985) Problems in estimating age-specific survival rates from recovery data of birds ringed as young. J Anim Ecol 54: 89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Law R (1979) The cost of reproduction in annual meadow grass. Am Naturalist 113:3– 16Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ashmole NP (1963) The regulation of numbers of oceanic birds. The Ibis 103b:458– 473Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    WootonJT (1987) The effects of body mass, phylogeny, habitat, and trophic level on mammalian age at first reproduction. Evolution 41: 732–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Read AF, Harvey PH (1989) Life history differences among the eutherian radiations. J Zool (London) 219: 329–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lack D (1968) Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Southwood TRE (1977) Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? J Anim Ecol 46: 337–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Southwood TRE (1988) Tactics, strategies and templets. Oikos 52: 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mace GM (1979) The evolutionary ecology of small mammals. PhD thesis, University of Sussex, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Harvey PH, Clutton-Brock T H (1985) Life history variation in primates. Evolution 39: 559–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gittleman JL (1986) Carnivore life history patterns: Allometric, phylogenetic and ecological associations. Am Naturalist 127: 744–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ross CR (1987) The intrinsic rate of natural increase and reproductive effort in primates. J Zool (London) 214: 199–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Roughgarden J (1971) Density-dependent natural selection. Ecology 52: 453–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Charlesworth B (1980) Evolution in age–structured populations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pianka ER (1970) On r- and K-selection. Am Naturalist 104: 592–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Boyce MS (1984) Restitution of r- and K-selection as a model of density dependent natural selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15: 427–448Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations