Advertisement

Evolution of Repetitive Sequences

  • Norihiro Okada
  • Mitsuko Aono
  • Hiroshi Endoh
  • Yukiharu Kido
  • Ryuta Koishi
  • Ken-Ichi Matsumoto
  • Mami Matsuo
  • Shigenori Murata
  • Shigehisa Nagahashi
  • Toshifumi Yamaki

Summary

Three families of tRNA-derived SINE (short interspersed element) in the genomes of salmonid species were isolated and characterized. These three families, the salmon Sma 1 family, charr Fok 1 family and salmonid Hpa 1 family, differ in sequence, but are all derived from a lysine tRNA or a tRNA species structurally related to lysine tRNA. These have been amplified at the specific stage of evolution of salmonid species. The average sequence divergence of the salmon Sma 1 family, charr Fok 1 family and salmonid Hpa 1 family are roughly 0.7%, 0.9%, and 3.1% respectively, showing that the Sma 1 family amplified the most recently and that the Hpa 1 family is the oldest. There is a parallel between these values and distribution at a different position in the phylogenic tree of these families in the salmonid species. Thus, the genome in the proto-Salmonidae was first shaped by amplification and dispersion of the salmonid Hpa 1 family, and then in the genome of some descendents the salmon Sma 1 or charr Fok 1 family was amplified and these genomes were again reshaped.

In addition to several SINEs in salmonid species, it was found that the genome of tortoise contains repetitive sequences, designated tortoise Pol III/SINE, which is also derived from a lysine tRNA, showing that retroposons are prevalent in vertebrate species. To search for a similar kind of retroposon in invertebrate species, in vitro transcription of total genomic DNA from various invertebrate species was performed. Sequences of repetitive families in squid and octopus were determined and it was found that they are tRNA-derived SINEs. The squid SINE is most similar to the lysine tRNA. The similarities of several SINEs including the human Alu to tRNAs were also reexamined. It was found that the human Alu can form a lysine tRNA-like structure, and Galago type II family, which was reported to be derived from a methionine initiator tRNA was also found to be the most similar to the lysine tRNA. Thus, lysine tRNA-like structures are widespread in genomes in the animal kingdom. The significance of these findings in relation to the evolution of salmonid species is discussed.

Keywords

Repetitive Sequence Chum Salmon Pink Salmon Masu Salmon Salmonid Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Weiner AM, Deininger PL, Efstratiadis A (1986) Noviral retroposons: Genes, pseudo- genes, and transposable elements generated by the reverse flow of genetic information. Ann Rev Biochem 55: 631–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ullu E, Tschudi C (1984) Alu sequences are processed 7SL RNA genes. Nature 312: 171–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lawrence CB, McDonnel DP, Ramsey WJ (1985) Analysis of repetitive sequence elements containing tRNA-like sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 13: 4239–4252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniels GR, Deininger PL (1985) Repeat sequence families derived from mammalian tRNA genes. Nature 317: 819–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakamoto K, Okada N (1985) Rodent type 2 Alu family, rat identifier sequence, rabbit C family, and bovine or goat 73-bp repeat may have evolved from tRNA genes. J Mol Evol 22: 134–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Endoh H, Okada N (1986) Total DNA transcription in vitro: A procedure to detect highly repetitive and transcribable sequences with tRNA-like structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 251–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsumoto K, Murakami K, Okada N (1986) Gene for lysine tRNA1 may be a progenitor of the highly repetitive and transcribable sequences present in the salmon genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 3156–3160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rogers J (1985) The origin and evolution of retroposons. Int Rev Cytol 93: 187–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Endoh H, Nagahashi S, Okada N (1990) A highly repetitive and transcribable sequence in the tortoise genome is probably a retroposon. Eur J Biochem 189: 25–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniels GR, Deininger PL (1983) A second major class of Alu family repeated DNA sequences in a primate genome. Nucleic Acids Res 11: 7595–7610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okada N (1990) Transfer RNA-like structure of the human Alu family: Implications of its generation mechanism and possible functions. J Mol Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith GR, Stearley RF (1989) The classification and scientific names of rainbow and cutthroat trouts. Fisheries 14: 4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomas WK, Withler RE, Beckenbach AT (1986) Mitochondrial DNA analysis of Pacific salmonid evolution. Can J Zool 64: 1058–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raba M, Limburg K, Burghagen M, Katze JR, Simsek M, Heckman JE, RajBhandary UL, Gross HJ (1979) Nucleotide sequence of three isoaccepting lysine tRNAs from rabbit liver and SV40-transformed mouse fibroblasts. Eur J Biochem 97: 305–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norihiro Okada
    • 1
  • Mitsuko Aono
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Endoh
    • 1
  • Yukiharu Kido
    • 1
  • Ryuta Koishi
    • 1
  • Ken-Ichi Matsumoto
    • 1
  • Mami Matsuo
    • 1
  • Shigenori Murata
    • 1
  • Shigehisa Nagahashi
    • 1
  • Toshifumi Yamaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biological SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukuba IbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations