Skip to main content

Gaze Control in Children with High Versus Low Motor Proficiency

  • Conference paper
Adapted Physical Activity

Abstract

Gaze control was compared between children demonstrating high vs low motor proficiency on the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Gaze during the response speed task, which measures reaction to a moving visual stimulus, was observed. Eye events were coded just prior, during, and after the release of the stick in the response speed task. A set of six gazes across seven trials of the task was recorded for all subjects. Low proficiency children were slower to respond to the falling stick than the high proficiency group. High performers tended to use a higher percentage of fixations across all trials. Most noticeble were differences between the groups at the moment of release. For high performers, fixations tended to be much longer, indicating the use of a steady gaze through to the final clamping motion of the thumb on the stick. Additionally, the location of gaze at the moment of release differed noticeably. High performers sustained their gaze on the stick while the low performers were as likely to focus on the stick, off the stick or at their own thumb. This study describes the role of gaze in the performance of tasks requiring a quick response to visual stimuli. The results suggest that differences between between proficient and clumsy motor responses in children may be associated with gaze control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Olson RK, Kliegl R, Davidson BJ (1983) Eye movements in reading disabilities. In: Rayner K (ed) Eye movements in reading: perceptual and language processes. Academic, London, pp 467–479

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rayner K (1983) The perceptual span and eye movement control during reading. (pp 97–120) In: Rayner K (ed) Eye movements in reading: perceptual and language processes. Academic, London, pp 467–479

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer B, Weber H (1990) Saccadic reaction times of dyslexic and age matched normal subjects. Perception 19:805–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Raymond JE, Ogden, Fagan NA, Kaplan BJ (1988) Fixational instability and saccadic eye movements of dyslexic children with subtle cerebellar dysfunction. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 3:174–181

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones A, Stark L (1983) Abnormal patterns of normal eye movements in specific dyslexia. In: Rayner K (ed) Eye movements in reading: perceptual and language processes. Academic, London, pp 491–498

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pavlidis GT (1981) Sequencing, eye movements and the early objective diagnosis of dyslexia. In: Pavlidis GT, Miles TR (eds) Dyslexia research and its application to education. Wiley, London, pp 99–163

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schmid R, Zambarbieri D (1991) Strategies of eye-hand coordination. In: Schmid R, Zambarbieri D (eds) Oculomotor control and cognitive processes. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 229–248

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zangemeister WH, Stark L (1982) Gaze latency: Variable interaction of head and eye latency. Exp Neurol 75:217–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guitton D, Volle M (1987) Gaze control in humans: eye-head coordination during orienting movements to targets within and beyond the oculomotor range. J Neurophysiol 58:427–459

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Optican LM (1985) Adaptive properties of the saccadic system. In: Berthoz A, Jones M (eds) Adaptive mechanisms in gaze control: facts and theories. Elsevier, New York, pp 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer B (1987) The preparation of visually guided saccades. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 106:2–35

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hattie J, Edwards H (1987) A review of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Br J Educ Psychol 57:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruininks RH (1978) Test of motor proficiency manual. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Dellen T, Geuze RH (1988) Motor response processing in clumsy children. J Child Psych 29:489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith TR, Glencross DJ (1986) Information processing deficits in clumsy children. Aust J Psych 38:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Emes, C., Vickers, J., Livingston, L. (1994). Gaze Control in Children with High Versus Low Motor Proficiency. In: Yabe, K., Kusano, K., Nakata, H. (eds) Adapted Physical Activity. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68272-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68272-1_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68274-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68272-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics