A Psychophysiological Approach to Physical Activity

  • Michel Bonnet
Conference paper


When they work under temporal constraints, implying attention control, human subjects can be considered as information processing systems that fulfill a succession of sequential operations where sensory messages are progressively transformed into motor messages. Within this framework of an information-processing view of motor control, the experimental evidence for the motor program to be formed by a set of instructions that correspond to different parameters is provided by using the advance information paradigm about an upcoming movement. Partial advance information is sufficient to trigger preparatory activities specific for the revealed dimension of the ensuing movement. The neurophysiological mechanisms which underlie the preparatory processes for action were studied by recording either the variations in excitability of the spinal and transcortical loops of the stretch reflex, or the scalp Contingent Negative Variation, using laplacian derivations. Different sensorimotor networks appeared to be engaged by preparation of movement according to the parameters involved. This provides evidence in favor of a parametric organization of motor programming.


Supplementary Motor Area Choice Reaction Time Motor Program Contingent Negative Variation Intended Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sanders AF (1990) Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychol 74:123–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosenbaum DA (1980) Human movement initiation: specification of arm direction and extent. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:444–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Favilla M, Hening W, Ghez C (1989) Trajectory control in targeted forces impulses. VI: Independent specification of response amplitude and direction. Exp Brain Res 75:280–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kurata K (1993) Premotor cortex of monkeys: Set- and movement-related activity reflecting amplitude and direction of wrist movements. J Neurophysiol 69:187–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lepine D, Glencross D, Requin J (1989) Some experimental evidence for and against a parametric conception of movement programming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:347–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    MacKay WA, Bonnet M (1990) CNV, stretch reflex and reaction time correlates of preparation for movement direction and force. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76:47–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Riehle A, Requin J (1989) Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: Single-cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement. J Neurophysiol 61:534–549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zelaznik HN, Hahn R (1985) Reaction time methods in the study of motor programming: the precueing of hand, digit, and duration. J Motor Behav 17: 190–218Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tanji J, Evarts EV (1976) Anticipatory activity of motor cortex neurons in relation to direction of an intended movement. J Neurophysiol 39:1062–1068PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonnet M, Requin J, Stelmach GE (1991) Changes in electromyographic responses to muscle stretch, related to the programming of movements parameters. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81:135–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Bonnet

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations