Comparative Study on the Response of Cardiopulmonary Function Between the Spinal Cord Injured and the Normal Sedentary During Maximal Exercise and Rest

  • Wan-Ki Lim
  • Yang-Ja Hong
Conference paper


The purpose of this study was to analyze the response of cardiopulmonary function between the spinal cord injured and the normal sedentary during maximal exercise and rest. The subjects were 10 spinal cord injured who did not participate in regular exercise and 10 normal sedentary college students. Incremental exercise testing to the point of exhaustion was done on all 20 subjects. The cardiopulmonary variables—V̇O2peak, V̇epeak, HRpeak, and O2pulsepeak—were measured by auto gas analyzer. Independent t-tests between the two groups were done to detect mean differences in these variables. The results were as follows: (a) significant differences between the spinal cord injured and the normal sedentary were found in V̇O2peak, V̇epeak, O2pulsepeak during maximal exercise; (b) no significant differences were found in HRpeak, VEpeak during maximal exercise; and (c) there were no statistical differences among all the variables in this study during rest.


Spinal Cord Maximal Exercise Spinal Cord Injure Peak Oxygen Uptake Peak Heart Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shephard RJ (1990) Fitness in special populations. Human Kinetics Books, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zwiren L, Bar-Or O (1975) Responses to exercise of paraplegics who differ in conditioning level. Med Sci Sports Exer 7:94–98Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glaser RM, Foley DM, Laubach LL, et al. (1978–79) An exercise test to evaluate Fitness for wheelchair activity. Paraplegia 16:341–349Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engel P, Hildebrant G (1973) Long term spiro-ergonometric studies of paraplegic during the clinical period of rehabilitation. Paraplegia 11:105–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glaser RM, Sawka MN, et al. (1981) Energy cost and cardiopulmonary responses for wheelchair locomotion and walking on tile and on carpet. Paraplegia 19:220–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coutts KD (1990) Peak oxygen uptake of elite wheelchair athletes. APA Quart 7:62–66Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glaser RM, Davis GM (1989) The wheelchair dependent individual. Exercise in Modern Medicine, pp 237–267Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wells CL (1990) The spinal injured athlete. APA Quart 7:265–285Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pollock ML, Miller HS, Linnerud AC, Laughridge E, Coleman E, Alexander E (1974) Arm pedalling as an endurance training regimen for the disabled. Arch Phys Med Rehab 55:418–424Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hildebrandt G, Voight E, Bahn D, et al. (1970) Energy costs of propelling a wheelchair at various speeds: Cardiac responses and effect on steering accuracy. Arch Phys Med Rehab 51:131–136Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pimentai, Nancy A, Michael N, Sawka, et al. (1984) Physiological responses to prolonged upper-body exercise. Med Sci Sports Exer 16:360–365Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coutts KD, Rhodes EC, McKenzie DC (1983) Maximal exercise responses of tetraplegics and paraplegics. J Appl Physiol 55(2):479–482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman MD (1986) Cardiorespiratory fitness and training in quadriplegics and paraplegics. Sports Med 3:312–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Loan M, McCluer S, Loftin JM, et al. (1987) Comparison of physiological responses to maximal arm exercise among able-bodied, paraplegics and quadriplegics. Paraplegia 25:397–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wan-Ki Lim
  • Yang-Ja Hong

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations