Esophageal Trauma: A Modern Perspective

  • Daniel Kirgan
  • Arjun Pennathur
  • Alex G. Little
Conference paper


Esophageal trauma remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. This is reflected by reported mortality rates of 15%–20% which have remained unchanged for several decades. Outcome is clearly influenced by several factors, such as the mechanism of injury, extent of associated injuries, age, anatomic location, and timing of operation [1]. Historically, early aggressive surgical intervention has been the mainstay of therapy. Conservative treatment is only appropriate for carefully selected cases of chronic contained perforations [2].


Primary Closure Esophageal Perforation Thoracic Esophagus Esophageal Injury Modern Perspective 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Flynn AE, Verrier ED, Way LW, Thomas AN, Pelegrini CA (1989) Esophageal Perforation. Arch Surg 124: 1211–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cameron JL, Kieffer RF, Hendrix TR, Mehigan DG, Bala RR (1978) Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic esophageal disruption. Ann Thorac Surg 27 (5): 404–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nesbitt JC, Sawyers JL (1987) Surgical management of esophageal perforation. Am Surg 53: 183–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michel L, Grillo HC, Malt R (1982) Esophageal perforations. Ann Thorac Surg 33 (2): 203–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gouge TH, Depan HJ, Spencer FC (1989) Experience with the Grillo pleural wrap procedure in 18 patients with perforation of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 209 (5): 612–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Kirgan
  • Arjun Pennathur
  • Alex G. Little
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Nevada School of MedicineLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations