Advertisement

Limitation of Non-Shunting Operation and Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy for Esophageal Varices and the Role of Combined Treatment

  • Kiyoaki Ouchi
  • Shuji Matsubara
  • Tsuyoshi Tominaga
  • Taisei Muto
  • Seiki Matsuno
Conference paper

Abstract

Formerly, the purpose of the non-shunting operation was to eradicate esophageal varices completely. Although most patients who received the complete operation of transthoracic esophageal transection and gastric devascularization (the Sugiura procedure) could achieve eradication of esophageal varices, patients who only received esophageal transection or gastric devascularization because of limited hepatic functional reserve showed a higher chance of residual or recurrent varices [1]. After induction of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) treatment strategy for esophageal varices varied dramatically. Although some authors reported that EIS is more than palliative treatment for esophageal varices, some reported high incidence of re-bleeding following EIS [2, 3]. There may be a place for combined therapy employing non-shunting operation and EIS for the treatment of esophageal varices. Based on our clinical experience with 132 non-shunting operations and 80 EISs for esophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis, the significance of combined therapy of both methods was studied referring the limitation of those two kinds of treatment.

Keywords

Esophageal Varix Variceal Bleeding Emergent Case Proximal Gastrectomy Ethanolamine Oleate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ouchi K, Abe M, Sato T (1987) Prediction of outcome following Sugiura’s procedure in patients with liver cirrhosis: A multiple linear regression analysis and scoring system. Dig Surg 4: 93–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chung RS, Dearlove J (1988) The sources of recurrent hemorrhage during long-term sclerotherapy. Surgery 104: 687–696PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Söderlund C, Ihre T (1985) Endoscopic sclerotherapy vs conservative management of bleeding esophageal varices. A 5-year prospective controlled trial of emergency and long-term treatment. Acta Chir Scand 151: 449–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inokuchi K (1985) Present status of surgical treatment of esophageal varices in Japan: A nationwide survey of 3588 patients. World J Surg 9: 171–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sugiura M, Futagawa S, Fukasawa M, Kinoshita E, Nakanishi R, Nishimura Y (1988) Experience with non-shunting operation for esophageal varices, 1980–87. In: Idezuki Y (ed) Treatment of esophageal varices. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 149–159Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spence RAJ (1988) Oesophageal transection for varices: Rationale, indications, technique and results. In: Idezuki Y (ed) Treatment of esophageal varices. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 123–139Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paquet K-J, Feussner H (1985) Endoscopic sclerosis and esophageal balloon tamponade in acute hemorrhage from esophageal varices: A prospective controlled randomized trial. Hepatology 5: 580–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiyoaki Ouchi
  • Shuji Matsubara
  • Tsuyoshi Tominaga
  • Taisei Muto
  • Seiki Matsuno
    • 1
  1. 1.First Department of SurgeryTohoku University School of MedicineAoba-ku, Sendai, 980Japan

Personalised recommendations