Gastroesophageal Reflux Due to Hiatal Incompetence—Influence of the Viscosity of the Gastric Content

  • Stig Sandmark
  • Björn Sandmark
  • Håkan Enbom
Conference paper


The lower esophageal sphincter provides important protection against gastroesophageal reflux [1]. Some authors have also stressed the importance of the hiatal mechanism in preventing reflux [2–6]. On contraction of the diaphragm, the muscles around the hiatus also contract and thereby pinch the esophagogastric tract. When the pressure difference across the diaphragm increases, the stomach wall and/or other viscera are forced towards and into the hiatal channel. In this way, the folds of the mucous membrane can be compressed so that the gastric contents cannot pass into a herniated part of the stomach or into the esophagus, making the hiatus competent. If the hiatal channel is wider, the gastric contents can pass the folds which means that the hiatus is incompetent. If the sphincter is also forced, reflux will occur. Earlier investigations have shown that substances with a high viscosity increase hiatal competence and decrease reflux. This observation provided the background for the invention of Gaviscon [3, 7]. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of varying the viscosity of gastric content on intraluminal pressures in patients with hiatal incompetence and incompetent sphincter.


Hiatus Hernia Gastroesophageal Reflux Lower Esophageal Sphincter Gastric Content Intraluminal Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Castell DO (1992) The esophagus. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edwards DAW (1982) The Anti-reflux Mechanism, its Disorders and their Consequences. In: Clinics in gastroenterology, vol 11, 3rd edn. London, WB Saunders, pp 479–496Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandmark S (1963) Hiatal incompetence. Acta Radiol [Suppl] (Stockh) 919: 1–46Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mittal RK, Fisher M, McCallum RW, Rochester DF, Dent J, Sluss J (1990) Human lower esophageal sphincter pressure response to increased intra-abdominal pressure. Am J Physiol 258: G624–G630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindell D, Sandmark S (1979) Hiatal incompetence and gastro-oesophageal reflux. Acta Radiol 20: 626–636Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sandmark S (1963) Intraluminal pressures and pH in hiatus hernia and gastroesophageal reflux. Acta Otolaryngol 56: 683–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sandmark S, Zenk L (1964) Treatment with Gaviscon in hiatus hernia. Lakartidningen 61: 1940–1943Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Savary M, Miller G (1978) The esophagus. Gassmann, SolothurnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stig Sandmark
  • Björn Sandmark
  • Håkan Enbom
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OtorhinolaryngologyÖrebro Medical Center HospitalÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations