Lumbar Spinal Stabilization by the MOSS System
Various internal fixation devices have been developed and used clinically to stabilize unstable spines [1–3], regardless of whether the cause is congenital or acquired. The more popular posterior fixation devices are pedicular fixation types, such as the Zielke, Cotrel-Dubousset (C–D), Puno-Winter, Rogozinski, modular segmental spinal instrumentation (MOSS), and Graf systems. All these devices have been known to provide secure fixation if they are properly applied, though each device has its disadvantages.
KeywordsFusion Rate Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Posterolateral Fusion Lumbosacral Spine Anterior Interbody Fusion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Tajima N, Kawano K (1989) Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine - A review of long term results. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 63: 262–268Google Scholar
- 5.Thompson WAL (1986) Lumbosacral spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 56: 1643–1647Google Scholar
- 6.Truchly G, Thompson WAL (1962) Posterolateral fusion of the lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 44: 505–512Google Scholar
- 7.Watkins MB (1953) Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 35: 1014–1018Google Scholar
- 8.Wilste LL (1968) The paraspinal sacrospinal splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 50: 919–926Google Scholar
- 11.Wiltse LL (1991) Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Jpn Spine Res Soc 2 (1): 161Google Scholar
- 12.Moon MS (1991) Comparison of effectiveness of C-D, Zielke and MOSS trans-pedicular screw fixation systems in the lower lumbar spinal disorders. J Jpn Spine Res Soc 2 (1): 163Google Scholar
- 13.Lowe TG (1987) Morbidity and mortality report of scoliosis. Scoliosis Research Society Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, September 6–8Google Scholar
- 14.Moon MS, Ha KY, Jung DY (1990) Pitfalls, errors, and complications in the transpedicular screw fixation surgery. J Korean Orthop Assoc 25: 169–176Google Scholar