Advertisement

Clinical Results of Lumbar Fusion for Heavy Workers with Lumbar Disk Herniation

  • Shunji Matsunaga
  • Takashi Sakou
  • Kazunori Yone
  • Eiji Taketomi
  • Tamotsu Morimoto
  • Kosei Ijiri

Abstract

Diskectomy has been the most frequently used surgical treatment for lumbar disk herniation. Although this operation has achieved good results in many cases, it has been reported that about 10%–20% of all cases require reoperation [1–5].

Keywords

Adjacent Segment Lumbar Disk Herniation Lumbar Fusion Heavy Worker Lumbar Disc Disease 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dvorak J, Gouchart W, Valach L (1988) The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. I. A 4-17 years’ follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine 13: 1418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frymoyer JW, Hanley E, Howe J, Kuhlmann D, Matteri R (1978) Disc excision and spine fusion in the management of lumbar disc disease: A minimum ten years follow-up. Spine 3: 361Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hurme M, Alaranta T, Torma T, Einolas S (1983) Operated lumbar disc herniation: Epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynaecol 72: 33Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nashold BS, Blaine S (1971) Lumbar disc disease: a twenty year clinical follow-up study. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naylor A (1974) Late results of laminectomy for lumbar disc prolapse: A review of ten to twenty-five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 56: 17Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barr JS, Kubik GS, Molloy MK (1967) Evaluation of end results in treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral disc with protrusion of nucleus polposus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 125: 250Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Young HH, Love GJ (1959) End results of removal protruded lumbar intervertebral discs with and without fusion. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instruct Course Lect 16: 213Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nachlas IW (1952) End-result study of treatment of herniated nucleus polposus by excision with fusion and without fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 34: 981Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vaughan PA, Malcolm BW, Maistrelli GL (1988) Results of L4-L5 disc excision alone versus disc excision and fusion. Spine 13: 690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nachemson A (1981) The role of spine fusion. Spine 6: 306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jensen AR (1958) The Maudsley personality inventory. Acta Psychol 14: 314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiesel SW (1985) The multiply operated lumbar spine. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instruct Course Lect 34: 68Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yashiro K, Hokari Y, Katsumi Y (1991) Necessity of the spinal fusion in salvage operation for the operated lumbar disc herniation (in Japanese). Orthop Surg 42: 1495Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiltse LL, Roshio PD (1975) Preoperative psychological tests as predictors of success of chemonucleolysis in the treatment of low-back syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57: 478Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, Weinstein JN, Reinarz ST, El-Khoury GY, Colby H (1987) Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine 12: 97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13: 375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shunji Matsunaga
  • Takashi Sakou
  • Kazunori Yone
  • Eiji Taketomi
  • Tamotsu Morimoto
  • Kosei Ijiri
    • 1
  1. 1.The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of MedicineKagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations