Summary
Using cadaver femurs, strains on the femoral surface and micromotions between stem and bone were measured.
Stress shielding in the proximal medial region after stem insertion was apt to be stronger with a collarless stem than with a collared stem.
It was considered important to obtain a close proximal fit in order to minimize micromotion in the proximal region of the stem. Distal fixation, however, did not exert any influence on micromotion in the proximal region. With a collared stem, micromotion in the proximal region was largest in proximal-loose and distal-fit. The collarless stem had generally smaller micromotion regardless of proximal and distal fixation. Therefore, it was considered more favorable to use a collarless stem to obtain proximal fixation of the stem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Oh I, Harris WH (1978) Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60: 75–85
Walker PS, Schneeweis D, Murphy S, Nelson P (1987) Strain and micromotion of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. J Biomech 20: 693–702
Whiteside LA, Easley JC (1989) The effect of collar and distal stem fixation on micromotion of the femoral stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 239: 145–153
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag Tokyo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okumura, Y., Imura, S., Oomori, H., Ichihashi, K., Takedani, H. (1992). Micromotions and Strains of Cementless Femoral Prostheses. In: Niwa, S., Perren, S.M., Hattori, T. (eds) Biomechanics in Orthopedics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68216-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68216-5_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68218-9
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68216-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive