Advertisement

Results of surgical treatment: Follow up study by Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan

  • Shigeki Arii
  • Takayoshi Tobe

Abstract

The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan has been conducting a follow up study of patients with primary liver cancer throughout the country since 1965 [1–7]. Up to December 31, 1987, more than 30,000 patients from 601 hospitals were registered in a computer at Kyoto University. This article reports the survival rates of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and with cholangiocellular carcinoma treated by partial hepatic resection, on the basis of responses received from January 1, 1978, when a prototype of the present questionnaire was introduced, to December 31, 1987. Special attention is paid to the survival rates in relation to clinicopathological factors, which provide significant information for estimating the prognosis in patients with primary liver cancer.

Keywords

Hepatic Resection Curative Resection Partial Hepatectomy Primary Liver Cancer Cumulative Survival Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Murakami F, Okamura T, Ohta M, et al. (1970) Liver disease and surgical treatment, particularly hepatic resection and transplantation. Shinryo 23: 265–277Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ishikawa K, Kosaka K (1973) Results of hepatic resection for primary liver cancer. Acta Hepatol Jpn 14: 409–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ishikawa K (1976) Follow-up Study of patients with primary liver cancer: Report 3. Acta Hepatol Jpn 17: 460–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Okuda K and The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (1980). Primary liver cancer. Cancer 45: 2663–2669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (1984) Primary liver cancer in Japan. Cancer 54: 1747–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (1987) Primary liver cancer in Japan. Cancer 60: 1400–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (1990) Primary liver cancer in Japan: Clinicopathologic features and results of surgical treatment. Ann Surg 211: 277–287Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cutler SJ, Ederer F (1958) Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 8: 699–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (1989) The general rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. Jpn J Surg 19: 98–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S (1985) Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161: 346–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Kuwata K, Tanaka N (1984) A multiple regression equation for prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure. Ann Surg 200: 658–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ozawa K, Aoyama H, Yasuda K, et al. (1983) Metabolic abnormalities associated with postoperative organ failure: A redox theory. Arch Surg 118: 1245–1251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shigeki Arii
    • 1
  • Takayoshi Tobe
    • 1
  1. 1.1st Department of SurgeryKyoto University Faculty of MedicineSakyo-ku, KyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations