Cone Theorems and Cyclic Covers

  • János Kollár


This note is a continuation of [Kollár91b]. The aim is again to prove various forms of the Cone Theorem using methods similar to the original geometric arguments of [Mori79;82]. The basic idea is the same as in [Kollár91b]. Instead of deforming a curve CX directly, we construct a covering YX and deform another morphism DY whereD is a suitable covering of C. In [ibid], Y was a bug-eyed cover of X, therefore a nonseparated algebraic space. The method of this article is to replace X by its formal completion along C and then find a suitable cyclic covering Y of this formal scheme.


Irreducible Component Complete Intersection Characteristic Zero Cartier Divisor Irreducible Curve 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Grothendieck62]
    A. Grothendieck, Fondements de la Geometric Algébrique, Sec. Math. Paris, 1962.Google Scholar
  2. [Kollar91a]
    J. Kollar, Flips, Flops, Minimal Models etc., to appear.Google Scholar
  3. [Kollâr91b]
    J. Kollar, Cone Theorems and Bug-eyed Covers, to appear.Google Scholar
  4. [Mori79]
    S. Mori, Projective Manifolds with Ample Tangent Bundles, Ann. of Math. 110 (1979), 593–606.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [Mori82]
    S. Mori, Threefolds whose Canonical Bundles are not Numerically Effective, Ann. of Math. 116 (1982), 133–176.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [Mori88]
    S. Mori, Flip theorem and the existence of minimal models for 3-folds, Journal AMS 1 (1988), 117–253.Google Scholar
  7. [Reid80]
    M. Reid, Canonical Threefolds, Géometrie Algébrique Angers, A. Beauville ed., Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1980, pp. 273–310.Google Scholar
  8. [SGAI71]
    A. Grothendieck, Revêtements Etales et Groupes Fondémentales, Springer LN 224, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • János Kollár
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations