Skip to main content

Hybrid Models and Conversion Algorithms for Solid Object Representation

  • Conference paper
Scientific Visualization of Physical Phenomena

Abstract

Traditional object representation schemes are often inadequate for supporting the variety of object manipulation tasks required in a modern solid modeling system. Hybrid schemes try to achieve a higher representative power by embedding the characteristics of several traditional models. The schemes we consider are Modular Boundary Models (MBMs), which describe the boundary of a solid object as the combination of face-abutting object parts represented in a boundary form, PM-Octrees, which are a combination of octrees and boundary representation, and PM-CSG trees, which are essentially octrees whose leaves represent CSG primitives. In particular, we will focus our attention on an MBM, called the Face-to-Face Composition (FFC) model, which also stores interference information useful to perform Boolean operations. We discuss the problems involved in conversion algorithms which operate between traditional models, and we review conversion algorithms on PM-Octrees and PM-CSG trees. We present a new algorithm for boundary evaluation of an FFC model, and discuss the problem of producing an FFC model from a boundary representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansaldi S., De Floriani L., Falcidieno B., (1985), “Geometric modeling of solid objects by using a face adjacency graph representation”, Computer Graphics, 19, 3, pp. 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayala D., Brunet P., Juan R., Navazo I., (1985), “Object representation by means of non minimal division quadtrees and octrees”, ACM Transaction on Graphics, 4, 1, pp. 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgart B.G., (1974), “Winged-edge polyhedron representation”, Technical Report STAN-CS-320, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brunet P., Navazo I., (1985), “Geometric modeling using exact octree representation of polyhedral objects”, Proceedings EUROGRAPHICS’85, pp. 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brunet P., Navazo I., (1989), “Solid representation and operation using extended octrees”, ACM Transaction on Graphics, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carlbom I., Chakravarty I., Vanderschel D., (1985), “A hierarchical data structure for representing spatial decomposition of 3-D objects”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 5, 4, pp. 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Floriani L., Falcidieno B., (1988), “A hierarchical boundary model for solid object representation”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 7, 1, pp. 42–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Floriani L., Maulik A., Nagy G., (1989), “Manipulating a modular boundary model with a face-based graph structure”, Geometric Modeling for Product Engineering. IFIP WG 5.2, Wozny M.J., Turner J.U., Preiss K., Eds., North-Holland, pp. 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Floriani L., (1989), “Feature extraction from boundary models of three-dimensional objects”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 8, pp. 785–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Floriani L., Bruzzone E., (1989), “Building a feature-based object description from a boundary model”, Computer Aided Design, 21, 10, pp. 602–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Floriani L., Maulik A., Nagy A., (1991) “Representation of solid objects by a modular boundary model”, Computer-aided mechanical assembly planning, Homemde-Mello L.S., Lee S., Eds., (to be published).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Durst M.J., Kunii T.L., (1989) “Integrated polytrees: a generalized model for the integration of spatial decomposition and boundary representation”, Theory and Practice of Geometric Modeling, W. Strafier, H.P. Seidel, Eds., Springer-Verlag, pp. 329–348.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Falcidieno B., Giannini F., (1989), “Automatic Recognition and Representation of Shape-Based Features in a Geometric Modeling System”, Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 48, 1, pp. 93–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujimura K., Kunii T.L., (1985) “A hierarchical space indexing method”, Proceedings of Computer Graphics’85, Tokyo, TI-4, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson M.R., (1984), “Extraction of feature information from three-dimensional CAD data”, PhD Thesis, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jared G.E., (1984), “Shape features in geometric modeling”, Solid Modeling by Computers: from Theory to Applications, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Joshi S., Chary T., (1988), “Graph-based heuristics for recognition of mechanical features from a 3D solid model”, Computer Aided Design, 20, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Juan R., (1988), “Boundary to Constructive Solid Geometry: a step towards 3D conversion”, Proceedings EUROGRAPHICS’88 Conference, Duce D., ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Juan R., (1989) “On Boundary to CSG and extended octree to CSG conversions”, Theory and Practice of Geometric Modeling, Strasser W., Seidel H.P., Eds., Springer-Verlag, pp. 349–367.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawaguchi E., Endo T., (1980), “On a method of binary picture representation and its application to data compression”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2, 1, pp. 27–35.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kyprianou L.K., (1980), “Shape classification in Computer-Aided-Design”, PhD Dis-sertation, Computer laboratory, University of Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mäntylä M., (1987), An Introduction to Solid Modeling, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Meagher D., (1980), “Octree encoding: a new technique for the representation, the ma-nipulation, and display of arbitrary 3-d objects by computer”, Technical Report, Electrical and System Engineering IPL-TR-80-111, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Navazo I., Fontdecaba J., Brunet P., (1987), “Extended octrees, between CSG trees and boundary representations”, Proceedings EUROGRAPHICS’87, North-Holland, pp. 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Navazo I., (1989), “Extended octree representation of general solids with plane faces: model structure and algorithms”, Computers & Graphics, 13, 1, pp. 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Requicha A.A.G., (1980), “Representations of rigid solids: theory, methods, and systems”, ACM Computing Surveys, 12, 4, pp. 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Requicha A.A.G., Voelcker H.B., (1982), “Solid modeling: a historical summary and contemporary assessment”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2, 2, pp. 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Requicha A.A.G., Voelcker H.B., (1985), “Boolean operation in solid modeling: boundary evaluation and merging algorithms”, Proceedings IEEE, 73, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rossignac J.R., Voelcker H.B., (1988), “Active zones in CSG for accelerating boundary evaluation, redundancy elimination, interference detection, and shading algorithms”, ACM Transaction on Graphics, 8, 1, pp. 51–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roth S.D., (1982), “Ray casting for modeling solids”, Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 18, pp. 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Samet H., Tamminen M., (1985), “Bintrees, CSG trees, and time”, Computer Graphics, 19, 3, pp. 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Samet H., Tamminen M., (1985), “Approximating CSG trees of moving objects”, Technical Report, CS-TR-1472, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Samet H., (1990) The Design and Analysis of Spatial Data Structures, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Samet H., (1990) Applications of Spatial Data Structures, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tamminen M., Samet H., “Efficient octree conversion by connectivity labeling”, Computer Graphics, 18, 3, pp. 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thibault W.C., Naylor B.F., (1987), “Set operations on polyhedra using space partitioning trees”, ACM Computer Graphics, 21, 4, pp. 153–162.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Tilove R.B., Requicha A.A.G., (1980), “Closure of Boolean operations on geometric entities”, Computer Aided Design, 12, 5 pp. 219–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tilove R.B., (1980), “Set membership classification: a unified approach to geometric intersection problems”, IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-29, 10, pp. 874–883.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Voelcker H.B., Requicha A.A.G., (1977), “Geometric modeling of mechanical parts and processes”, IEEE Computer, 10, 12, pp. 48 - 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weiler K., (1986), “Topological structures for geometric modeling”, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer and System Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wilson P.W., Pratt M., (1985), “Requirements for support of form features in a solid modelling system”, Technical Report, Geometric Modelling Project, CAM-I.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Woo T.C., (1982), “Feature extraction by volume decomposition”, Proceedings Conference on CAD/CAM in Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Woo T.C., (1985), “A combinatorial analysis of boundary data structure schemata, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 5, 3, pp. 19–27.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Wyvill G., Kunii T.L., (1985), “A functional model for constructive solid geometry” Visual Computer, 1, 1, pp. 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wyvill G., (1990), “Geometry and modelling for CAD systems”, Tutorial Notes — CG International ’90 Conference, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Floriani, L., Puppo, E. (1991). Hybrid Models and Conversion Algorithms for Solid Object Representation. In: Patrikalakis, N.M. (eds) Scientific Visualization of Physical Phenomena. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68159-5_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68159-5_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68161-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68159-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics