Skip to main content

Pitfalls of the Sophy Programmable Pressure Valve: Is it Really Better than a Conventional Valve and an Anti-Siphon Device?

  • Conference paper
Hydrocephalus

Summary

Twelve patients with hydrocephalus were shunted using the Sophy programmable pressure valve (SU-8). Positional shunt flow and intraventricular pressure (IVP) were measured. An anti-siphon device (ASD) was inserted primarily in seven patients. Two of the five patients without an ASD developed subdural hematoma (SDH) and one developed slit ventricle syndrome (SVS). Upgrading the valve resistance failed to control SDH and SVS and required the addition of an ASD to control overdrainage.

In the sitting position, shunt flow was maximal in the low-pressure valve without an ASD (group A1: 1164 ml/day) and least in the medium- and highpressure valves with an ASD (group B2: 48 ml/day). Intermediate values were found in the medium- and high-pressure valves without an ASD (group A2: 528 ml/day) and in the low-pressure valve with an ASD (group B1: 183 ml/ day). For supine shunt flow, there were no significant differences among the four groups (1.1–9.1 ml/day).

In all groups, IVPs in the sitting position were significantly lower than those in the supine position. IVPs in the supine position were the lowest in group A1 (0.7 ± 1.1 cmH2O) and the highest in group B2 (22.0 ± 4.3cmH2O). Intermediate values were found for groups A2 and B1 (5.9 ± 3.0 and 12.7 ± 5.4 cmH2O, respectively). IVPs in the sitting position were also the lowest in group A1 (−17.5 cmH2O) and the highest in group B2 (0.5 ± 4.0 cmH2O). Intermediate values were found for groups A2 and B1 (−13.0 ± 2.8 and −10.7 ± 9.1 cmH2O, respectively). Even the high-pressure Sophy valve without an ASD showed overdrainage and highly negative IVP in the sitting position. In contrast, overdrainage was well controlled in the shunt systems with an ASD. The experimental shunt flow and the least IVP necessary to initiate shunt flow account well for our clinical experiences.

Upgrading the Sophy valve resistance alone is not sufficient to prevent SDH and SVS. Combined use together with an ASD is essential when patients assume the erect position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abe H, Chiba Y, Tokoro K (1990) Effect of anti-siphon device in shunting procedure: intraventricular pressure during positional changes (abstract). 1st International Symposium on Hydrocephalus, Kobe, Japan (this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PH, Cosman ER, Arnold MA (1990) The relationship between ventricular fluid pressure and body position in normal subjects and subjects with shunts: A telemetric study. Neurosurgery 26: 181–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich U, Lumenta C, Sprick C, Majewski B (1987) Subdural hematoma in a case of hydrocephalus and macrocrania. Experience with a pressure-adjustable valve. Nerv Syst Child 3: 242–244

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein F, Fleischer AS, Hochwald GM, Ransohoff J (1974) Subtemporal craniectomy for recurrent shunt obstruction secondary to small ventricles. J Neurosurg 41: 29–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foltz EL, Blanks JP (1988) Symptomatic low intracranial pressure in shunted hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 68: 401–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox JL, McCullough DC, Green RC (1973) Effect of cerebrospinal fluid shunts on intracranial pressure and on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. 2. A new technique of pressure measurements: Results and concepts. 3. A concept of hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 36: 302–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuse T, Takagi T, Ohno M, Nagai H (1990) Experience with shunting operation using a pressure-adjustable valve (in Japanese). No Shinkei Geka 18: 139–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber R, Jenny P, Herzog B (1984) Experiences with the anti-siphon device (ASD) in shunt therapy of pediatric hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61: 156–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horton D, Pollay M (1990) Fluid flow performance of a new siphon-control device for ventricular shunts. J Neurosurg 72: 926–932

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Itoh K, Matsumae M, Tsugane R, Sato O (1989) The shunt flow in a programmable pressure valve (in Japanese). Shoni No Noshinkei 14: 143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi K, Kowada M, Sasaki J, Watanabe K, Sasajima H, Yoneya M (1990) Ventriculoperitoneal shunts with the use of a pressure-adjustable valve in the management of hydrocephalus (in Japanese). No Shinkei Geka 18: 241–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loayza P (1987) Valvula de presión variable en el tratamiento de hidrocefalia con ventriculos chicos. Rev Chil Neurochirurg 1: 299–302

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough DC (1986) Symptomatic progressive ventriculomegaly in hydrocephalics with patent shunts and antisiphon devices. Neurosurgery 19: 617–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough DC, Fox JL (1974) Negative intracranial pressure hydrocephalus in adults with shunts and its relationship to the production of subdural hematoma. J Neurosurg 40: 372–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy HD, Schulte RR, Fox JL, Croissant PD, Tripp L (1973) Anti-siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 38: 729–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd TG, Shurtleff DB, Loeser JD, Nelp WB (1973) Radionuclide assessment of cerebrospinal fluid shunt function in children. J Nucl Med 14: 683–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sainte-Rose C, Hooven MD, Hirsch F (1987) A new approach in the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 66: 213–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J, Sperke N, Spring A (1989) The treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus by magnetic transcutaneous adjustable valves (abstract). Ninth International Congress of Neurological Surgery, New Delhi, India, p 98

    Google Scholar 

  • Seida M, Ito U, Tomida S, Yamazaki S, Inaba Y (1987) Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt malfunction with an anti-siphon device in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: Report of three cases (in Japanese). Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 27: 769–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tokoro K, Chiba Y (1989) Effects on shunt flow of position of anti-siphon device and of changes in posture in hydrocephalus (abstract). Ninth International Congress of Neurological Surgery, New Delhi, India, p 100

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokoro K, Chiba Y (to be published, 1991) Optimum position for an anti-siphon device in a cerebrospinal fluid shunt system? Neurosurgery 29(4)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tokoro, K., Chiba, Y., Abe, H. (1991). Pitfalls of the Sophy Programmable Pressure Valve: Is it Really Better than a Conventional Valve and an Anti-Siphon Device?. In: Matsumoto, S., Tamaki, N. (eds) Hydrocephalus. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68156-4_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68156-4_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68158-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68156-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics