Advertisement

Potentiation of 3-(4-Amino-2-Methyl-5-Pyrimidinyl) Methyl-1-(2-Chloroethyl)-Nitrosourea Cytotoxicity in Resistant Human Glioma Cell by Pretreatment with 5-(3-Methyl-1-Triazeno) Imidazole-4-Carboxamide

  • Toshimitsu Aida
  • Hiroshi Abe
  • Kouichi Tokuda
  • Shinji Sugimoto

Abstract

In our previous studies, we reported the results that O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (O6-AT) plays an important role in determining the cellular resistance to treatment with chloroethylnitrosourea (CENU) [1–3]. The mechanism of cellular resistance has not been fully understood, but it is clear that O6-AT repairs O6-chloroethylguanine before it can rearrange to form the DNA interstrand cross-link [4–5], and this results in cellular resistance to the cytotoxic effects of CENUs. O6-AT also prevents the induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) by CENUs, since the increased induction of SCEs is due to higher levels of DNA interstrand cross-links [1,2,6]. The reduction of O6-AT activity in tumor cells which are resistant to CENUs may be used to improve the clinical effectiveness of CENUs, since this activity protects the cytotoxic effects of these agents. This has been approached by pretreatment with a monofunctional methylating agent [2,7,8]. 5-(3-dimethyl-1-triazeno) imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC) is a chemotherapeutic agent used primarily to treat malignant melanoma, sarcoma, and lymphoma. DTIC requires metabolic activation through oxidative N-demethylation leading to the formation of the N-demethyl derivative, 5-(3-methyl-1-triazeno) imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC), a potent alkylating agent. Recently, MTIC has been shown to alkylate DNA in the O6 of guanine and to be more cytotoxic in O6-AT deficient cells (Mer) than in O6-AT proficient cells (Mer+) [9,10].

Keywords

Sister Chromatid Exchange Human Glioma Cell Line Cellular Resistance Human Colon Tumor Cell Proficient Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aida T, Bodell WJ (1987) Cellular resistance to chloroethylnitrosoureas, nitrogen mustard, and cisdiamminedichloroplatinum ( II) in human glial-derived cell lines. Cancer Res 47: 1361–1366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aida T, Cheitlin RA, Bodell WJ (1987) Inhibition of O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyl-transferase activity potentiates cytotoxicity and induction of SCEs in human glioma cells resistant to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Carcinogenesis 8: 1219–1223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bodell WJ, Aida T, Berger MS, Rosenblum ML (1986) Increased repair of O6-alkylguanine DNA adducts in glioma-derived human cells resistant to the cytotoxic and cytogenetic effects of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Carcinogenasis 7: 879–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith DG, Brent TP (1989) Response of cultured human cell lines from rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts to treatment with chloroethylnitrosoureas. Cancer Res 49: 883–886PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robins P, Harris AL, Goldsmith I, Lindall T (1983) Cross-linking of DNA induced by chloroethylnitrosourea is prevented by 06-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res 11: 7743–7758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tokuda K, Bodell WJ (1988) Cytotoxicity and induction of sister chromatid ex-changes in human and rodent brain tumor cells treated with alkylating agents. Cancer Res 48: 3100–3105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zlotogorski C, Erickson LC (1984) Pretreatment of human colon tumor cells with DNA methylating agents inhibits their ability to repair chloroethylmonoadducts. Carcinogenesis 5: 83–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Futsher BW, Micetith KC, Barres DM, Fisher RI, Erickson LC (1989) Inhibition of a specific DNA repair system and nitrosurea cytotoxicity in resistant human cells. Cancer Commun 1: 65–73Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Catapano CV, Broggini, Erba E, Ponti M, Mariani L, Citti L, D’Incaici M (1987) In vitro and in vivo methazolastone-induced DNA damage and repair in L-1210 leukemia sensitive and resistant to chloroethylnitrosoureas. Cancer Res 47: 4884–4889PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lunn JM, Harris AL (1988) Cytotoxicity of 5-(3-methyl-l-triazono)imidazole- 4-carboxamide (MTIC) on Mer+, Mer+Rem- and Mer+ cell lines: Differential potentiation by 3-acetanidobenzamide. Br J Cancer 57: 54–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bodell WJ, Aida T, Rusmussen J (1985) Comparison of sister chromatid exchange induction caused by nitrosoureas that alkylate or alkylate and crosslink DNA. Mutat Res 149: 95–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshimitsu Aida
  • Hiroshi Abe
  • Kouichi Tokuda
  • Shinji Sugimoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryHokkaido UniversitySapporo, 060Japan

Personalised recommendations