Computer Graphics and Design Automation: Continued Synergy or a Parting of Ways?

  • Michael J. Wozny
Conference paper


From its very beginning, computer graphics has had a significant influence on the evolution of engineering design automation. Ivan Sutherland’s MIT thesis, “Sketchpad” in 1963 laid the foundation for interactively creating and manipulating line geometry on a computer generated graphical display. This capability lead to the interactive generation of engineering drawings, the first successful commercial venture in computer graphics. From a design point of view, the CAD system simply automated the human process of generating drawings, and only indirectly improved the process of design. Furthermore, the lines drawn on the screen had no associativity, no concept of a surface or volume. In effect, the computer graphics system was just a glorified plotting capability.


Computer Graphic Medial Axis Free Form Surface Design Intent Concurrent Engineering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Nevill, G.E., Jr., “Computational Models of Design Processes,” in Design Theory ’88, Newsome, Spillers, and Finger, eds., Springer-Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suh, N.P., The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersson, K., Artificial Intelligence in Computer-Aided Design, TRITA-MAK 1989: 1, ISSN 1100-5335, Licentiate Thesis, Department of Mechanical Design, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniell, J.D., “An Object Oriented Approach to CAD Tool Control,” Research Report No. CMUCAD-89-37, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie-Mellon Univerity, Pittsburgh, April, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tong, C., “Toward an Engineering Science of Knowledge-Based Design,” AI in Engineering, 2, 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weiler, K.J., “Topological Structures for Geometric Modeling,” PhD Thesis, Rensselaer Design Reearch Center Report TR-86032, Troy, NY, August, 1986, (also PhD Thesis).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawabe, S., Shimada, K., and Masuda, H., A Framework for 3D Modeling: Constraint-Based Description and Non-Manifold Geometric Modeling, presented at 2nd Toyota Conference, Aichi-ken, Japan, October 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abi-Ezzi, S., “The Graphical Processing of NURBS in a Highly Dynamic Environment,” Rensselaer Design Research Center Report TR-89001, Troy, NY, May 1989, (also PhD Thesis)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bohn, J.H., “Computing the Unit Normal for Non-Uniform Reational B-Spline Surfaces,” Rensselaer Design Research Center Report TR-89061, Troy, NY, December 1989, (also MS Thesis)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Wozny
    • 1
  1. 1.Rensselaer Design Research Center, CII7015Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations