Potential Benefits of Superconductivity to Transportation in the United States

  • Donald M. Rote
  • Larry R. Johnson


Research in U.S. transportation applications of superconductors is strongly motivated by a number of potential national benefits. These include the reduction of dependence on petroleum-based fuels, energy savings, substantially reduced air and noise pollution, increased customer convenience, and reduced maintenance costs. Current transportation technology offers little flexibility to switch to alternative fuels, and efforts to achieve the other benefits are confounded by growing congestion at airports and on urban roadways. A program has been undertaken to identify possible applications of the emerging superconducting applications to transportation and to evaluate potential national benefits. The current phase of the program will select the most promising applications for a more detailed subsequent study. Transportation modes being examined include highway and industrial vehicles, as well as rail, sea, and air transport and pipelines. Three strategies are being considered: (1) replacing present components with those employing superconductors, (2) substituting new combinations of components or systems for present systems, and (3) developing completely new technologies. Distinctions are made between low-, medium-, and near-room-temperature superconductors. The most promising applications include magnetically levitated passenger and freight vehicles; replacement of drive systems in locomotives, self-propelled rail cars, and ships; and electric vehicles inductively coupled to electrified roadways.


Electric Vehicle Argonne National Laboratory Transportation Mode Auxiliary Equipment Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Holcomb, M.C., S.D. Floyd, and S.L. Cagle, Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 9, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-6325 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, L.R., Written testimony for U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, Subcommittee on Water Resources, Transportation, and Infrastructure, Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Chairman, Washington, D.C. (Feb. 26, 1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Green, C., et al., Magnetocaloric Refrigeration ,David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center Report DTNSRDC/87/032 (March 1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holtz, R.E., and J.L. Krazinski, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, personal communication (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolger, J.G., et al., Test of the Performance and Characteristics of a Prototype Inductive Power Coupling for Electric Highway Systems ,Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-7522 (July 1978).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bolger, J.G., Power and Control from the Roadway: Status, Potential, and Constraints, Inductran Corp., 1325 Ninth St., Berkeley, Calif. 94710 (Oct. 1986).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herring, S., Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415, personal communication (1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald M. Rote
    • 1
  • Larry R. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Energy and Environmental Systems DivisionArgonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA

Personalised recommendations