Computational Mechanics ’86 pp 537-542 | Cite as

# Effect of Elastic Strains in Steady-State Elasto Visco-Plastic Flow

## Summary

The effect of elastic strains in the steady state elasto visco-plastic flow (Maxwell fluid) under the rolling process is analyzed quantitively. As a simple model for treating an elastic effect, the Jauman derivative of stress is considered. Several schemes are found for analyzing the model by the finite element method (2’9). Shimazaki and Thompson (5) used the mixed method which decouples the momentum and continuity equations from the constitutive equation. Because the constitutive equation becomes nonlinear due to the elastic effect, an iterative procedure is incorporated between two sets of finite element equations until convergence is obtained. The decoupled formulation scheme requires a less storage area for the stiffness matrix, therefore, the amount of computer time is often decreased for higher nonlinear problems even if it incorporates the simple iterative procedure.

Although the above method appears to be stable at low elastic responses, oscillations in stress begin to appear as the elastic effect is increased. This can be attributed to the property of the standard Galerkin method which produces a central difference type of approximation in the constitutive equation.

In this paper we use the same algorithm as in (5), but the Petrov-Galerkin method is introduced into the finite element equation for the constitutive law. As a result, oscillations in stress are eliminated, the rate of convergence is improved and convergence is obtained even in the presence of a higher elastic response

## Keywords

Stress Deviator Viscoelastic Fluid Elastic Effect Finite Element Equation Maxwell Fluid## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.Han, C.D., Rheology in Polymer Processing, Academic Press (1976).Google Scholar
- 2.Kawahara, M. and N. Takeuchi, “Mixed Finite Element Method for Analysis of Viscoelastic Fluid Flow”, Computers and Fluids, 5, pp 33–45, 1977.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dawson, P. R. and E. G. Thompson, “Finite Element Analysis of Steady-State Elasto-Visco-Plastic Flow by the Initial Stress-Rate Method”, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 12, pp 47–57,1978. See also addendum Vol.12, pp 382–383, 1978.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Crochet, M. J. and M. Bezy, “Numerical Solutions for the Flow of Viscoelastic Fluids”, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 5, pp 281–288, 1979.Google Scholar
- 5.Shimazaki, Y. and E. G. Thompson, “Elasto Visco-Plastic Flow with Special Attention to Boundary Conditions”, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng., 17, pp 97–112, 1981.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Thompson, E.G., “Inclusion of Elastic Strain Rates in the Analysis of Viscoplastic Flow During Rolling”, Int. J. Mech. Sci., Vol. 24, No. 11, pp 655–659, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Crochet, M. J, and R. Keunings, “Numerical Simulation of Viscoelastic Flow in Some Polymer Processing Applications”, Numerical Analysis of Forming Procses, Chapter 8, Jhon Wiley ξ Sons Ltd., (1984).Google Scholar
- 8.Thompson E. G, and H. M. Berman, “Steady-State Analysis of Elasto-Viscoplastic Flow During Rolling”, Numerical Analysis of Forming Processes, Chapter 9, Jhon Wiley ξ Sons Ltd., (1984).Google Scholar
- 9.Zienkiewics, O.C., “Flow Formulation for Numerical Solution of Forming Processes”, Numerical Analysis of Forming processes, Chapter 1, Jhon Wiley ξ Sons Ltd., (1984).Google Scholar
- 10.Josse, S. L. and B. A. Finlayson, “Reflection on the Numerical Viscoelastic Flow Problem”, Journal of Non- Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 16, pp 13–36, 1984.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Shiojima, T. and Y. Shimazaki “A pressure smoothing scheme for incompressible flow problems using finite element method”, in preparation.Google Scholar