Advertisement

A Minimum Principle on Displacements and a Related NLP Formulation for the Elastostatics of Cable Systems

  • M. Cannarozzi
  • R. Contro
Conference paper

Summary

Behaviour of cable networks affected by geometric and physical nonlinearity combined, due to large displacements and cable slackening respectively, is investigated through a minimum principle on displacements. Relevant sign-constrained Non Linear Programming formulation, concerning algebraic or algebrized problems, is considered as the basis for numerical analyses. A significant example shows the successful match between the proposed approach and a suitable devised algorithm.

Keywords

Minimum Principle Physical Nonlinearity Cable Element Cable Network Cable Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Maier, G.; Contro, R.: Energy approach to inelastic cable-structure analysis. J. of Eng. Mech. Divis. 101 (1975) 531–548.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cannarozzi, M.: Stationary and extremum variational formulation for the elastostatics of cable networks. Meccanica 20 2 (1985) 136–143.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cannarozzi, M.: A minimum principle for tractions in the elastostatics of cable networks. To appear in Int. J. of Solids and Structures.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cannarozzi, M.: Analysis of elastic networks is presence of cable slackening, (in italian) TR 92 I.S.C.B. (1984).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Contro, R.; Ballabio, D.: An efficient algorithm for the energy analysis of large nonlinear structures. Euromech Colloquium 185, Imperial College, London 1984.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Contro, R.: Analysis and design of cable structures by optimization techniques. Proc. of Int. Symp. on Weitgespannte Flächentragwerke, Stuttgart, March 1985 2 (1985) 94–110.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Contro, R.; Maier, G.: Inelastic analysis of pretensioned cable structures by mathematical programming. To be presented at Int. Conf. on Steel Structures, Budva Jugoslavia 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nobel B.; Sewell, M.J.: On dual extremum principles in applied mathematics. J. Ints. Maths. Applies. 9 (1972) 123–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex analysis, p. 32 Princeton Univ. Press. 1972.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maier, G.; Munro, J.: Mathematical programming methods in engineering plastic analysis. Appl. Mech. Rev. 35 (1983) 1631–1643 (1986 update by G. Maier and D.L. Smith, forthcoming).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reklaitis, G.V.; Ravindran, A.; Ragsdell, K.M.: Engineering optimization: methods and applications. Chap.13. New York: Wiley 1983.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ballabio, D.: An efficient algorithm for nonlinear analysis of structures with a large number of degrees of freedom, (in italian) Degree Thesis (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Cannarozzi
    • 1
  • R. Contro
    • 2
  1. 1.Istituto di Scienza delle CostruzioniUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Ingegneria StrutturalePolitecnico of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations