Advertisement

On the Improvement of the Boundary Element Analysis for the Crack Problems

  • H. Kisu
  • R. Yuuki
  • T. Matsumoto
Conference paper

Abstract

The boundary element method has attracted special interest as a powerful method to analyze the crack problems. However, there still remain some problems to be improved for the accuracy and efficiency. In this study, it is attempted that some simple and accurate methods for determining the stress intensity factors are developed and introduced into the BEM analysis. In the three dimensional BEM analysis, Mindlin’s solution has been used as a fundamental solution for a point load acting within a semi- infinite medium instead of the ordinary Kelvin’s solution. It is expected that the accuracy of solution is improved and that the cost for computation is reduced because there is no necessity for dividing into elements on the surface where boundary conditions are satisfied by the fundamental solution.

Keywords

Stress Intensity Factor Fundamental Solution Boundary Element Method Crack Problem Uniform Tension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kitagawa, H., Yuuki, R., Kisu, H. and Kawabata, H.; Trans. JSME, 50–450 A (1984), 129.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kisu, H., Yuuki, R. and Kitagawa, H.; Advances in Fracture Research (ICF6), vol.2 (1984), 927.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kisu, H., Yuuki, R. and Kitagawa, H.; Trans. JSME, 51–463 A (1985), 660.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mindlin, R.D.; Physics, vol.7, May (1936) 195.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kitagawa, H. and Yuuki, R.; Trans. JSME, 43–376 (1977), 4354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freese, C.E.; Mechanics of Fracture (Sih, G.C. ed.), 1(1973), Noordoff, 41.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murakami, Y and Nisitani, H.; Trans. JSME, 41–348 (1975), 2255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    “The Strength of Rotating Body” ed. by Sub-Comittee of the Strength of Rotating Body, JSME, (1977), 38.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Raju, I.S. and Newman, J.C.,Jr.; Eng. Frac. Mech., 11–4 (1979), 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Isida, M. and Noguchi, H.; Trans. JSME, 48–429 A (1982), 607.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Kisu
    • 1
  • R. Yuuki
    • 2
  • T. Matsumoto
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringNagasaki UniversityNagasaki, 852Japan
  2. 2.Institute of Industrial ScienceUniversity of TokyoRoppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106Japan
  3. 3.Graduate SchoolUniversity of TokyoHongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113Japan

Personalised recommendations