Skip to main content

Solid Modeler with Assembly Representation Tables

  • Conference paper
Advanced Computer Graphics

Abstract

We, the authors, have developed our own Solid Modeler with Assembly Representation Tables (SMART) with the aim of improving the functions to represent the assembly composed of many components which has been lacking in the existing solid modelers. SMART has also such a characteristic as applying the relational database to itself, which allows the commercial database adopting mainly the relational database to be utilized with easy interchangeability.

SMART has a hierarchical data structure which has the data called “top” as top level and some “ASSEMBLY’s on the levels beneath the “top”. Also it has “OBJECT” and “PRIMITIVE” furthermore beneath the said levels, and each of these also has the data “RELATION” which represents the relationship between lower-ranking level data. And they all link to each other in a ring structure.

On the relational database (RDB), SMART consits of four relations, i.e. ASSEMBLY, OBJECT, PRIMITIVE, and RELATION, and the individual relation has its own attribute as column data such as the tuple number, lower- ranking level tuple number, initial number of relation, etc. as shown below.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. M. Managaki, “Relational Database and CAD”, Computer Today No. 7, May 1985 (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Yamaguchi, T.L. Kunii, “PICCLO Logic for a Picture Database Computer and its Implementation”, Reprinted from IEEE Transactions on Computers Vol. C-31, No. 10, Oct. 1982

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.M. Eastman, “The Design of Assemblies”, SAE Technical Paper Series, Feb. 1981

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. M.A. Wesley, L.I. Lieberman, D.D. Grossman, etc., “A Geometric Modeling System for Automated Mechanical Assembly”, IBM J. RES. DEVELOP. Vol. 24, No. 1, Jan. 1980

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Lee, D.C. Gossard, “A hierarchical data structure for representing assemblies: part 1”, CAD, Vol. 17, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Takase, N. Nakajima, “A Language for Describing Assembled Machines”, Proc. of ISDS, PP600–605, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Ishida, H. Minowa, N. Nakajima, “Detection of Unanticipated Function of Machines”, Proc. of ISDS, PP21–26, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Yamaguchi, T. Tokieda, “A Solid Modeler with a 4*4 Determinant Processor”, CG and Applications (IEEE), April 1985

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hasegawa, T., Nakajima, N. (1986). Solid Modeler with Assembly Representation Tables. In: Kunii, T.L. (eds) Advanced Computer Graphics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68036-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68036-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-68038-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-68036-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics