Ventricular Interaction and the Role of the Pericardium: Effects of Right Ventricular Loading

  • John V. Tyberg
  • Eldon R. Smith


For several years, the concepts that left ventricular diastolic compliance and systolic performance might be influenced by alterations in right ventricular hemodynamics (ventricular interaction) or by the constraining effect of the pericardium have been recognized. However, to a considerable degree, these concepts have been examined and discussed in isolation. That is, it has often been implicitly assumed that ventricular interaction and pericardial constraint are independent phenomena. In this review of recent experimental studies which involve right ventricular dilation (pulmonary embolization, volume loading, and right ventricular infarction), we attempt to present an integrated view—increased right ventricular diastolic pressure both moves the septum leftward and, by raising pericardial pressure over the ventricles, augments pericardial constraint, thus diminishing left ventricular preload. Therefore, the pressure gradients both across the ventricular septum and across the left ventricular free wall are diminished. This concerted dual action is consistent with the definition of left ventricular transmural pressure proposed by Mirsky and Rankin.


Right Ventricle Transmural Pressure Left Ventricular Free Wall Ventricular Interaction Left Ventricular Compliance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Maruyama Y, Ashikawa K, Isoyama S, Kanatsuka H, Ino-Oka E, Takishima T (1982) Mechanical interactions between four heart chambers with and without the pericardium in canine hearts. Circ Res 50: 86–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mirsky I, Rankin JS (1979) The effects of geometry, elasticity, and external pressures on the diastolic pressure-volume and stiffness-stress relations: how important is the pericardium? Circ Res 44: 601–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smiseth OA, Frais MA, Kingma I, Smith ER, Tyberg JV (1985) Assessment of pericardial constraint in dogs. Circulation 71: 158–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smiseth OA, Frais MA, Kingma I, White AVM, Knudtson ML, Cohen JM, Manyari DE, Smith ER, Tyberg JV (1986) Assessment of pericardial constraint: the relation between right ventricular filling pressure and pericardial pressure measured after pericardiocentesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 7: 307–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smiseth OA, Refsum H, Tyberg JV (1984) Pericardial pressure assessed by right atrial pressure: a basis for calculation of left ventricular transmural pressure. Am Heart J 108: 603–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tyberg JV, Taichman GC, Smith ER, Douglas NWS, Smiseth OA, Keon WJ (1986) The relation between pericardial pressure and right atrial pressure: an intraoperative study. Circulation 73: 428–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boltwood CM, Skulsky A, Drinkwater DC, Lang S, Mulder DG, Shah PM (1986) Intraoperative measurement of pericardial constraint: role in ventricular diastolic mechanics. J Am Coll Cardiol 8: 1289–1297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smiseth OA, Scott-Douglas NW, Thompson CR, Smith ER, Tyberg JV (1987) Non-uniformity of pericardial surface pressure in dogs. Circulation 75: 1229–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz LN (1955) Analysis of the several factors regulating the performance of the heart. Physiol Rev 35: 91–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Belenkie I, Dani R, Smith ER, Tyberg JV (1988) Ventricular interaction during experimental acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 78: 761–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Braunwald E, Ross J Jr (1963) The ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Am J Med 34: 147–150 (editorial)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Traboulsi M, Scott-Douglas NW, Smith ER, Tyberg JV (1987) Measurement of right ventricular transmural pressure, (abstract) Clin Invest Med 10(5): C33Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kingma I, Tyberg JV, Smith ER (1983) Effects of diastolic transseptal pressure gradient on ventricular septal position and motion. Circulation 68: 1304–1314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glantz SA, Parmley WW (1978) Factors which affect the diastolic pressure-volume curve. Circ Res 42: 171–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tyberg JV (1985) Ventricular interaction and the pericardium. In: Levine HJ, Gaasch WH (eds) The ventricle: basic and clinical aspects. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague pp 171–184Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belenkie I, Dani R, Smith ER, Tyberg JV (1989) Effects of volume loading during experimental acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 80: 178–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Traboulsi M, Scott-Douglas NW, Belenkie I, Tyberg JV, Smith ER (1989) Right ventricular infarction decreases left ventricular compliance and performance by a pericardial mechanism. J Am Coll Cardiol 13: 235A.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smiseth OA, Refsum H, Junemann M, Sievers RE, Lipton MJ, Carlsson E, Tyberg JV (1984) Ventricular diastolic pressure-volume shifts during acute ischemic ventricular failure in dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol 3: 966–977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dell’Italia LJ, Walsh RA (1988) Right ventricular diastolic pressure-volume relations and regional dimensions during acute alterations in loading conditions. Circulation 77: 1276–1828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Traboulsi M, Scott-Douglas NW, Tyberg JV, Smith ER (1988) Right ventricular performance during extensive right ventricular infarction. Clin Invest Med 11(5): D85Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • John V. Tyberg
  • Eldon R. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical ResearchAlbertaCanada

Personalised recommendations