Advertisement

The Concept of Systolic Myocardial Stiffness with Applications to the Assessment of Myocardial Contractility in Health and Disease

  • Israel Mirsky

Summary

This review article briefly describes the new concept of systolic myocardial stiffness and its application to assessing the myocardial contractile state in patients with aortic and mitral valve disease. The physiologic studies demonstrate linearity of the end-systolic stress-strain relation (ESSSR) which results in nonlinearity of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation. If Vo (volume at zero stress), is not markedly altered by drug interventions, changes in the slope of the ESSSR reflect changes in the inotropic state. The concept also permits the development of the entire ejection fraction-afterload relation (for a given preload) thus enabling contractile states to be compared between ventricles.

An approximate method based on a single beat analysis to assess myocardial contractility is applied to clinical data obtained from patients with aortic and mitral valve disease. The contractile state based on conventional methods shows marked discrepancies compared with those assessed on the basis of the systolic stiffness concept. The value of this concept is demonstrated by comparing contractile states pre- and postoperatively in several patients.

Keywords

Inferior Vena Cava Aortic Stenosis Mitral Regurgitation Myocardial Contractility Mitral Valve Disease 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Suga H, Sagawa K (1974) Instantaneous pressure-volume relationships and their role in the excised supported canine left ventricle. Circ Res 35: 117–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kass DA, Maughan WL (1988) From ‘Emax’ to pressure-volume relations: a broader view. Circulation 77: 1203–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mirsky I, Tajimi T, Peterson KL (1987) The development of the entire end-systolic pressure-volume and ejection fraction-afterload relations: A new concept of systolic myocardial stiffness. Circulation 76: 343–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mirsky I, Rankin JS (1979) The effects of geometry, elasticity and external pressures on the diastolic pressure-volume and stiffness-stress relations. How important is the pericardium? Circ Res 44: 601–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rankin JS, McHale PA, Arentzen CE, Ling D, Greenfield JC Jr, Anderson RW (1976) The three-dimensional dynamic geometry of the left ventricle in the conscious dog. Circ Res 39: 304–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mirsky I, Corin WJ, Murakami T, Grimm J, Hess OM, Krayenbuehl HP (1988) Correction for preload in assessment of myocardial contractility in aortic and mitral valve disease: An application of the concept of systolic myocardial stiffness. Circulation 78: 68–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grossman W, Braunwald E, Mann T, McLaurin LP, Green LH (1977) Contractile state of the left ventricle in man as evaluated from end-systolic pressure-volume relations. Circulation 56: 845–852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mehmel HC, Stockins B, Ruffman K, Olhausen K, Schuler G, Kubler W (1981) The linearity of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship in man and its sensitivity for assessment of left ventricular function. Circulation 63: 1216–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaseda S, Tomoike H, Ogata I, Nakamura M (1985) End-systolic pressure-volume, pressure-length, and stress-strain relations in canine hearts. Am J Physiol 249: H648–H654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sagawa K, Maughan WL, Burkhoff D, Yue D (1985) The similarity of ventricular pressure-volume relation (abstract) and muscle force-length relation. Cardiovasc Res 19: 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suga H, Yamada O, Goto Y, Igarashi Y (1986) Peak isovolumic pressure-volume relation of puppy left ventricle. Am J Physiol 250: H167–H172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elzinga G, Westerhof N (1979) How to quantify pump function of the heart: the value of variables derived from measurements on isolated muscle. Circ Res 44: 303–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mirsky I, Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E (1983) The contractile state as the major determinant in the evolution of left ventricular dysfunction in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Circ Res 53: 767–778PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Colan SD, Borow KM, Neumann A (1984) Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress-velocity of fiber shortening relation: A load-independent index of myocardial contractility. J Am Coll Cardiol 4: 715–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wisenbaugh T (1988) Does normal pump function belie muscle dysfunction in patients with chronic severe mitral regurgitation? Circulation 77: 515–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunter WC, Janicki JS, Weber KT, Noordergraaf A (1983) Systolic mechanical properties of the left ventricle: Effects of volume and contractile state. Circ Res 52: 319–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shroff SG, Janicki JS, Weber KT (1985) Evidence and quantitation of left ventricular systolic resistance. Am J Physiol 249: H358–H370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aoyagi T, Fujii AM, Gelpi RJ, Hittinger L, Crocker VM, Mirsky I (in Press) Application of the systolic stiffness concept to assess myocardial function in developing hypertension. Jpn Heart JGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Israel Mirsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations