Advertisement

Investment Distinctions: The Effect of Taxes on Foreign Direct Investment in the U.S.

  • Deborah L. Swenson
Conference paper

Abstract

Most studies of taxation and foreign investment limit their investigation to the effects of tax changes on aggregate foreign investment flows. The reason is practical; little evidence is readily available that would allow researchers to consider the effects of taxes on individual firm investment decisions. However, it seems likely that this data limitation may in fact cause researchers to draw the wrong conclusions regarding the actual responsiveness of investment flows to tax differences. In part, there are reasons for firms to remain in a particular location once they have selected it once. This persistence of investment activity may cause most repeat investors to have little responsiveness to small tax differences, while newer investors will respond more vigorously.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Foreign Investment Agglomeration Economy Equity Increase Investment Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auerbach, Alan J. and Kevin Hassett, (1993), “Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: A Reconsideration of the Evidence,“ in Alberto Giovannini, R. Glenn Hubbard, and Joel Slemrod eds. Studies in International Taxation, 119–144.Google Scholar
  2. Bartik, Timothy J. (1991) who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies? (W.E. Upjohn Institute: Kalamazoo, Michgan).Google Scholar
  3. Brainard, Lael S. (1997) “An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Tradeoff between Multinational Sales and Trade,“ American Economic Review, 87(4):520–544.Google Scholar
  4. Caves, Richard E. (1996). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Coughlin, Cletus C., Joseph V. Terza, and Vachira Arromdee, (1991), “State Characteristics and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment within the United States,“ Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 675–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hallward-Driemeier, Mary. (1996) “Understanding Foreign Direct Investment by Firms: Market Pull, Cost Push and Knowledge Accumulation,“ Massachusetts Institute of Technology, manuscript.Google Scholar
  7. Head, C. Keith, John C. Ries, and Deborah L. Swenson, (1994) “The Attraction of Foreign Manufacturing Investments: Investment Promotion and Agglomeration Economies,“ NBER Working Paper 4878.Google Scholar
  8. Head, C. Keith, John C. Ries, and Deborah L. Swenson, (1995) “Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investment in the United States,“ Journal of International Economics, V38, no 3/4, p223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hines, James R. (1996a) “Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in America,“ American Economic Review, v86, no 5, p1076–1094.Google Scholar
  10. Hines, James R. (1996b) “Tax Policy and the Activities of Multinational Corporations,“ NBER Working Paper, #5589, May.Google Scholar
  11. Krugman, Paul R., (1991) “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography,“ Journal of Political Economy, 99:483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Markusen, James R. (1995) “The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9:(2) 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Markusen, James R. and Anthony J. Venables, (1996), “The Theory of Endowment, Intra-Industry, and Multinational Trade,“ National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper #5529.Google Scholar
  14. Roberts, Mark and James Tybout. (1995) “An Empirical Model of Sunk costs and the Decision to Export.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 1436.Google Scholar
  15. Ondrich, Jan and Michael Wasylenko, (1993) Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Issues, Magnitudes, and the Location Choice of New Manufacturing Plants, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Scholes, Myron S. and Mark A. Wolfson. (1992) Taxes and Business Strategy: A Planning Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Sinn, Hans Werner, (1991). “The Vanishing Harberger Triangle,“ Journal of Public Economics, 45: 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Swenson, Deborah L. (1994) “The Impact of U.S. Tax Reform on Foreign Direct Investment in the United States.” Journal of Public Economics, 54(2):243–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wasylenko, Michael. “Empirical Evidence on Interregional Business Location Decisions and the Role of Fiscal Incentives in Economic Development,“ in Henry W. Herzon, Jr. and Alan M. Schlottmann, eds., Industry Location and Public Policy. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennesse Press, 1991, 13–30.Google Scholar
  20. Wheeler and Mody (1992), “International Investment Location Decisions: The Case of U.S. Firms,“ Journal of International Economics, 33:57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah L. Swenson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and NBERUniversity of California, DavisUSA

Personalised recommendations