In Situ Hybridization for DNA: Fluorescent Probe

  • Morimasa Matsuta
  • Mayumi Matsuta
Part of the Springer Lab Manuals book series (SLM)


Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosomespecific probes is one of the non-isotopic in situ hybridization methods that opens up several new areas of cytogenetic investigation by allowing visual determination of the presence and normality of specific genetic sequences in single metaphase or interphase cells (Pinkel 1986a, 1986b). With this approach, the genetic loci to be analyzed are made microscopically visible in single cells using in situ hybridization with nucleic acid probes specific to these loci. The DNA in target cells is made as a single strand and incubated with single-stranded fluoro chromedirectly- labeled or chemically modified DNA probe under conditions where the probe will anneal only with DNA sequences to which it has high DNA sequence homology. The bound chemically modified probe is made visible by immunofluorescent detection methods. This technique is often called standard FISH.


Propidium Iodide Comparative Genomic Hybridization Wash Solution Rubber Cement Antifade Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Du Manoir S, Kallioniemi O.P., Lichter P et al (1995) Hardware and software requirements for quantative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 19:4–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Houldsworth J, Chaganti R.S.K. (1994) Comparative genomic hybridization: An overview. Am J Pathol145:1253–1260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O.P., Sudar D, Rutovits D, Gray J.W., Waldman F.M., Pinkel D (1992) Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258:818–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kallioniemi O.P., Kallioniemi A, Kurisu W, Thor A, Yu L.C., Smith H.S., Waldman F.M., Pinkel D, Gray J.W. (1992) ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89; 5321–5325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi O-P, Sudar D, Rutovits D, Gray J.W., Waldman F.M., Pinkel D (1993) Comparative genomic hybridization: A rapid new method for detecting and mapping DNA amplification in tumors. Semin Cancer Biol4:41–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kallioniemi O.P., Kallioniemi A, Piper J, Isola J, Waldma, F.M., Gray J.W., Pinkel D (1994) Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Gene Chrom Cancer 10: 231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Matsuta M, Matsuta M, Hayashi S, Yasumi S, Sasaki K, Kuroda Y, Nishiya I (1996) Reconstructed Three-dimensional Images of Flow-sorted Nuclei Hybridized with Chromosome-specific Probes. J Histochm Cytochem 44: 1337–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Matsuta M, Matsuta M, Kon S, Thompson C, LeBoit P.E., Weier H.U., Gray J.W. (1994) Interphase cytogenetics of melanocytic neoplasmic numerical aberrations of chromosomes can be detected in interphase nuclei using antromeric DNA probes. J Cutan Pathol 21:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Persons D.L., Hartmann L.C., Herath J.F., et al. (1993) Interphase molecular cytogenetic analysis of epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Am J Path 142:733–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pinkel D, Gray J.W., Trask B, van den Engh G, Fucoe J, van Dekken, H (1986a) Cytogenetic analysis by in situ hybridization with fluorocently labeled nucleic acid probes. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 51: 151–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray J.W. (1986b) Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high sensitivity fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 2934–2938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Piper J, Rutovits D, Sudar D, et al (1995) Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. Cytometry 9:10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Qian J, Bostwick D.G., Takahashi S, et al.(1995) Chromosomal anomalies in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Res 55:5408–5414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Schroeck E, Veldman T, Padilla-Nash H et al. (1997) Spectral karyotyping refines cytogenetic diagnostics of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities. Human Genetics 101:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. White D.M., Crolla J.A., Ross F.M. (1995) Detection of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Br J Haematol 91:1019–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morimasa Matsuta
    • 1
  • Mayumi Matsuta
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIwate Medical UniversityMoriokaJapan

Personalised recommendations