Skip to main content

Syringomyelia Associated with Tethered Cord Syndrome

  • Conference paper
Syringomyelia

Summary

The pathogenesis and dynamic pathophysiology of syringomyelia are not fully understood. Pathogenetically, syringomyelia is categorized as either a communicating syrinx (hydromyelia) or a noncommunicating syrinx. The latter category includes those caused by (1) contusion, (2) compression, (3) traction, (4) arachnoiditis, (5) tumors, and (6) ischemia. Syringomyelia located in the lumbosacral cord is likely derived from the same types of pathogenesis. The signs and symptoms of lumbosacral syringomyelia are similar to those of tethered cord syndrome (TCS), caused by the lesion being in the central portion of the spinal cord. Neurological deficits in these disorders are motor and sensory deficits in the lower limbs, incontinence, and musculoskeletal deformities. Syringomyelia associated with TCS is a unique combination and difficult to correlate because TCS is a metabolic functional disorder and syringomyelia is an anatomic functional criterion. The authors divided a series of syrinx patients into three groups: (1) those with lumbosacral syringomyelia associated with tethered spinal cord, in which the spinal cord is anchored by an inelastic filum; (2) those with low thoracic and lumbar syringomyelia associated with TCS, in which a lipoma, lipomyelomeningocele, or meningocele manqué is the mechanical cause of tethering; and (3) those with a syrinx in the lower thoracic and lumbosacral cord without evidence of a tethered cord. The syrinxes in the patients in all three groups were considered to be isolated from the fourth ventricle cord. The authors’ observations include: (1) The incidence of lumbosacral syrinx in tethered spinal cord patients is much lower than that in TCS patients; (2) The group 1 patients have milder neurological symptomatology than do the group 2 patients. The degree of improvement in the neurological conditions and physical activities are much greater in group 1 than in group 2 patients; (3) Group 3 patients tend to have more serious neurological deficits associated with hydrocephalus and severe musculoskeletal deformities. Based on these facts, the authors postulate that syrinxes should be drained in cases in which the signs and symptoms suggest that the neurological deficits are more significant than those for TCS alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Oliver d’Angers CP (1824) De la Moelle Epiniere et de ses Maladies. Chez Crevot, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  2. Foster JB (1991) Neurology of syringomyelia. In: Batzdorf U (ed) Syringomyelia: Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 91–115

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iskandar BJ, Oakes WJ, McLaughlin C, et al (1994) Terminal syringomyelia and occult spinal dysraphism. J Neurosurg 81:513–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koyanagi I, Iwasaki Y, Hida K, et al (1997) Surgical treatment of syringomyelia associated with dysraphism. Childs Nerv Syst 13:194–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Erkan K, Unal F, Kiris T (1999) Syringomyelia in association with the tethered cord syndrome. Neurosurgery 45:1351–1360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP (1976) The tethered cord: its protean manifestations, diagnosis and surgical implications. Childs Brain 2:145–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamada S, Zinke DE, Sanders DC (1981) Pathophysiology of “tethered cord syndrome.” J Neurosurg 54:494–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamada S, lacono RP, Andrade T, et al (1995) Pathophysiology of tethered cord syn- drome. Neurosurg Clin N Am 6:311–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamada S, lacono RP, Yamada BS (1996) Pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome. In: Yamada S (ed) Tethered cord syndrome. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park Ridge, IL, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  10. McLone DG, Dauser RC (1996) The tethered cervical spinal cord. In: Yamada S (ed) Tethered cord syndrome. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park Ridge, IL,pp 99–102

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yamada S (1983) Microsurgery: syringomyelia, section X. In: Austin GM (ed) The spinal cord. Igaku Shoin, Tokyo, pp 413–444

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yamada S, lacono RP, Morgese V, et al (1996) Tethered cord syndrome in adults. In: Menezes AH, Sonntag VH (eds) Principles of spinal surgery. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 433–445

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada S, Lonser RR, Yamada SM, et al (1996) Tethered cord syndrome associated with myelomeningoceles and lipomyelomeningoceles. In: Yamada S (ed) Tethered cord syndrome. American Association of Neurological Surgery. Park Ridge, IL, pp 103–123

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kunitomo K (1918) The development and reduction of the caudal end of the spinal cord. Contrib Embryol Carnegie Inst 8:161–198

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pang D (1986) Tethered cord syndrome. In: Hoffman HJ (ed) Advances in pediatric neurosurgery. Hanley & Belfus, Philadelphia, pp 45–80

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heiss JD, Patronas N, DeVroom HL, et al (1999) Elucidating the pathophysiology of syringomyelia. J Neurosurg 91:553–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Batzdorf U, Klepkamp J, Johnson JP (1998) A critical appraisal of syrinx cavity shunting procedures. J Neurosurg 89:382–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Menezes A (2000) Indication for fusion of the craniovertebral junction. Lecture at the 16th annual meeting, section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Indian Hills, CA, February 23–26, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  19. Milhorat TH, Kotzen RM, Anzil AP (1994) Stenosis of central canal of spinal cord in man: incidence and pathological finding: cases. J Neurosurg 80:716–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Milhorat TH, Johnson WD, Miller JI, et al (1992) Surgical treatment of syringomyelia based on magnetic resonance imaging criteria. Neurosurgery 31: 231–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barnett HJM, Jousse AT, Ball MJ (1973) Syringomyelia. Saunders, London, pp 179–219

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barnett HJM (1973) Syringomyelia. Saunders, London, pp 179–219

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gardner WJ (1965) Hydrodynamic mechanism of syringomyelia: its relationship to myelocele. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 28:247–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamada S, lacono R (1995) 10. Tethered cord syndrome. In: Pang D (ed) Disorders of the pediatric spine. Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Tokyo

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yamada, S., Knierim, D.S., Won, D.J., Hadden, A.G. (2001). Syringomyelia Associated with Tethered Cord Syndrome. In: Tamaki, N., Batzdorf, U., Nagashima, T. (eds) Syringomyelia. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-67893-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-67893-9_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-67995-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-67893-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics