Advertisement

Patient Presentation and Pathologic Diagnosis of Superficial Carcinoma of the Esophagus: High-Grade Dysplasia and Mucosal Carcinoma from the Japanese Standpoint

  • Kaiyo Takubo
  • Tomio Arai
  • Shingo Ishiguro

Abstract

It is well known that there are large differences between Western and Japanese pathologists regarding the criteria used for the histologic diagnosis of dysplasia and carcinoma with no or minimal invasion in the gastrointestinal tract 2, 3, 4, 5. Many of these discrepancies arise from differences in the nomenclature used to describe gastrointestinal tract cancers.

Keywords

Esophageal Cancer Intramucosal Carcinoma Mucosal Carcinoma Vienna Classification Japanese Pathologist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stolte M (1999) Diagnosis of gastric carcinoma: Japanese fairy tales or Western deficiency? Virchows Arch 434:279–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schlemper RJ, Itabashi M, Kato Y, et al (1997) Differences in diagnostic criteria for gastric carcinoma between Japanese and Western pathologists. Lancet 349:1725–1729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jass JR (1999) Discrepancies between East and West. Cancer 88:969–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schlemper RJ, Dawsey SM, Itabashi M, et al (2000) Differences in diagnostic criteria for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between Japanese and Western pathologists. Cancer 88:996–1006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takubo K (2000) Pathology of the esophagus. Educa, Tokyo, pp 131–168Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sekine H, Shibuki S, Ohara H, et al (1994) Issues of gastric biopsy for diagnosis of benign/malignant borderline lesion: from the viewpoint of long-term clinical follow-up. I to Cho 29:143–151 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schlemper RJ, Kato Y, Riddell RH, et al (1999) New consensus Vienna Classification of Gastrointestinal Epithelial Neoplasia. I to Cho 34:1043–1049 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al (2000) The Vienna Classification of Gastrointestinal Epithelial Neoplasia. Gut 47:251–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takubo K, Takai A, Takayama S, et al (1987) Intraductal spread of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 59:1751–1757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takubo K, Nishimura H, Taniguchi Y, et al (1984) Junctions between intraepithelial carcinoma and non-neoplastic tissue of the esophagus: light and electron microscopic studies. Act Pathol Jpn 34:785–796Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Registration Committee for Esophageal Cancer of The Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases (2000) Comprehensive registry of esophageal cancer in Japan (1988–1994), 1st edn. Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases, Chiba-city, pp 19–39Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nisizawa M, Nomoto K, Ueno M, et a! (1992) Natural history of gastric cancer in a fixed population with emphasis on depressed sm cancer. I to Cho 27:16–24 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosen PP (1997) In situ (intra-epithelial) carcinoma: an overview. In: Rosen’s Breast Pathology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 219–221Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Broders AC (1932) Carcinoma in situ contrasted with benign penetrating epithelium. JAMA 99:1670–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaiyo Takubo
    • 1
  • Tomio Arai
    • 2
  • Shingo Ishiguro
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of GerontologyTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric HospitalTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Clinical PathologyTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric HospitalTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of PathologyOsaka Medical Center of Cancer and Adult DiseasesOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations