Deployable Structures in Biology

  • Julian F. V. Vincent
Conference paper


Deployable structures are common in the living world, allowing delicate structures to be kept out of harm’s way until they are needed. They can be one-dimensional (everting tubes), two-dimensional (insect wings, leaves) or three-dimensional (worms, skeletal mechanisms such as fish jaws). They are mostly actuated by hydraulic pressure (plants and soft-bodied animals) or muscular systems (animals) and some are actuated using stored strain energy so that they can deploy at high speed (jellyfish sting cells, some fish jaws). For the organism, déployable structures give greater command over the local environment with little weight penalty. In robotics, déployable structures can be lighter than fixed structures with the same functionality, and can increase overall functionality by being deployed sequentially, thus giving separate functions which can be mutually independent.


Secondary Vein Insect Wing Vascular Canal Store Strain Energy Deployable Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander RMcN (1983) Animal Mechanics. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Altshuller G (1999) The innovation algorithm, TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Worcester, Mass., USA, Technical Innovation Center Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Bennet-Clark HC, Lucey ECA (1967) The jump of the flea. J Exp Biol 47:59–76 Brackenbury JH (1994) Wing folding and free-flight kinematics in Coleoptera (Insects): a comparative study. J Zool Lond 232:253–283Google Scholar
  4. Clark RB (1964) Dynamics in metazoan evolution. The origin of the coelom and segments. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellington CP (1980) Wing mechanics and take-off preparation of Thrips (Thysanoptera). J Exp Biol 85:129–136Google Scholar
  6. Glaser AE, Vincent JFV (1979) The autonomous inflation of insect wings. J Insect Physiol 25:315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gosline JM (1971) Connective tissue mechanics of Metridium senile II Viscoelastic properties and a macromolecular model. J Exp Biol 55:775–795Google Scholar
  8. Haas F (1994) Geometry and mechanics of hind-wing folding in Dermaptera and Coleoptera. MSc Thesis, Exeter, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Haas F, Gorb S, Blickhan R (2000) The function of resilin in beetle wings. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1375–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hepburn HR (1971) Proboscis extension and recoil in Lepidoptera. J Insect Physiol 17:637–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hodick D, Sievers A (1989) On the mechanism of trap closure of venus flytrap Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Planta 179:32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holstein TW, Benoit M, Herder GV, Wanner G, David CN, Gaub HE (1994) Fibrous mini-collagens in Hydra nematocysts. Science 265:402–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hush JM, Hawes CR, Overall RL (1990) Interphase microtubule re-orientation predicts a new cell polarity in wounded pea roots. J Cell Sei 96:47–611Google Scholar
  14. Jeronimidis G, Parkyn AT (1988) Residual stresses in carbon fibre-thermoplastic matrix laminates. J Comp Mater 22:401–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katoh K, Naitoh Y (1994) Control of cellular contraction by calcium in Vorticella. J Exp Biol 189:163–177Google Scholar
  16. Ker R F (1977) Some structural and mechanical properties of locust and beetle cuticle. PhD Thesis, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Kerkut GA (1953) The forces exerted by the tube feet of the starfish during locomotion. J Exp Biol 30:575–583Google Scholar
  18. Kobayashi H, Daimaruya M, Vincent JFV (2000) Folding/unfolding manner of tree leaves as a deployable structure. In: Pellegrino S, Guest SD (eds) Déployable Structures: Theory and Applications, Proc IUTAM Symp 1998. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp211–220Google Scholar
  19. Kobayashi H, Kresling B, Vincent JFV (1998) The geometry of unfolding tree leaves. Proc Roy Soc B 265:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koehl MAR (1996) When does morphology matter. Ann Rev Ecol Sys 27:501–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kresling B (2000) Coupled mechanisms in biological deployable structures. In: Pellegrino S, Guest SD (eds), Deployable structures: theory and applicatons. Kluwer Academic Publications, London, pp229–237Google Scholar
  22. Morgan J, Cannell MGR (1987) Structural analysis of tree trunks and branches: tapered cantilever beams subject to large deflections under complex loading. Tree Physiol 3:365–374Google Scholar
  23. Morgan J, Cannell MGR (1988) Support costs of different branch designs: effects of position, number, angle and deflection of laterals. Tree Physiol 4:301–313Google Scholar
  24. Muller M (1996) A novel classification of planar 4-bar linkages and its application to the mechanical analysis of animal systems. Phil Trans R Soc B 351:689–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pellegrino S, Vincent JFV (2001) How to fold a membrane. In: Pellegrino S (ed) Deployable Structures Springer-Verlag, Vienna, pp59–76Google Scholar
  26. Pollack GH (2000) Cells, gels and the engines of life. Ebner & Sons, Seattle WA, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Reynolds SE (1997) Control of cuticle extensibility in the wings of adult Manduca at the time of eclosion: effects of eclosion hormone and bursicon J Exp Biol 70:27–39Google Scholar
  28. Skaer RJ, Picken LER (1966) The pleated surface of the undischarged thread of a nematocyst and its simulation by models. J Exp Biol 45:173–176Google Scholar
  29. Snodgrass R E (1942) The skeleto-muscular mechanisms of the honey bee. Washington, Smithsonian Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Vincent JFV (1975) How does the female locust dig her oviposition hole? J Ent A 50:175–181Google Scholar
  31. Vincent JFV (1981) The morphology and ultrastructure of the intersegmental membrane of the female locust. Tiss Cell 13:831–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vincent JFV (1998) Smart by nature. In: Beukers A, Hinte Ev (eds) Lightness the inevitable renaissance of minimum energy structures. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam. pp42–47Google Scholar
  33. Vincent JFV (2001) Stealing ideas from nature. In: Pellegrinos S (ed) Deployable Structures. Springer-Verlag, Vienna, pp51–58Google Scholar
  34. Vincent JFV, King MJ (1996) The mechanism of drilling by wood wasp ovipositors. Biomimetics 3:187–201Google Scholar
  35. Vincent JFV, Mann DL (2000) TRIZ in biology teaching TRIZ Journal.Google Scholar
  36. Wainwright SA, Biggs WD, Currey JD, Gosline JM (1976) The mechanical design of organisms. Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Weintraub M (1951) Leaf movements in Mimosa pudica L. New Phytol 50:357–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weis-Fogh T, Amos WB (1972) Evidence for a new mechanism of cell motility. Nature Lond 236:301–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wootton RJ (1981) Support and deformability in insect wings. J Zool Lond 193:447–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian F. V. Vincent
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe UniversityBathUK

Personalised recommendations