Skip to main content

Student Profile Scoring for Formative Assessment

  • Conference paper
New Developments in Psychometrics

Summary

This paper is adapted from an invited address delivered by Professor Stout and a symposium presentation delivered by Dr. DiBello at the 2001 International Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Osaka, Japan. This first IMPS meeting to be held in Japan was an auspicious occasion for bringing together statisticians and psychometricians from Japan with their North American and European colleagues. It provided an important forum for discussing new opportunities for assessment in the twenty-first century that result from a fortuitous conjunction of heightened public attention to school effectiveness and new psychometric methods that allow the practical operationalization of more complex cognitive models. In this paper we recall the term formative assessment as it is used in education, and define a class of scoring procedures called student profile scoring. We describe the formative aspects of the mostly summative US No Child Left Behind legislation. We outline the simple cognitive modeling that is reflected in the reparameterized unified model. We close with a call to psychometricians for a paradigm shift that moves the testing industry beyond an almost exclusive focus on low dimensional, data reductionist methods to include student profile scoring based on richer, substantively-grounded models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Black PJ, Wiliam D (1998) Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Black PJ, Harrison C, Lee C, Marshall B, Dylan W (2002) Working inside the black box: assessment for learning in the classroom. London, UK: King’s College London Department of Education and Professional Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBello L, Stout W, Roussos L (1995) Unified cognitive/psychometric diagnostic assessment likelihood-based classification techniques. In: Nichols P, Chipman S, Brennen R (eds) Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum. 361–389

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBello L, Crone C, Narcowich M (2001) Descriptive score reporting on a national standardized test. NCME presentation, Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Doignon JP, Falmagne JC (1985) Spaces for the assessment of knowledge. International Journal of Man Machine Studies 23: 175–196

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson SE (1998) A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods 3: 380–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer GH (1973) The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica 37: 359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist 18: 519–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartz, SM (2002) A bayesian framework for the Unified Model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality. PhD Thesis: U Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker BW, Sijtsma K (2001) Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement 25 (3): 258–272

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Maris E (1999) Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64 (2): 187–212

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Van Lehn K (1995) A Bayesian approach to cognitive assessment. In: Nichols P, Chipman S, Brennen R (eds) Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum. pp 141–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy RJ (1997)Probability-based inference in cognitive diagnosis. In Nichols P, Chipman S, Brennan R (eds) Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, pp 43–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy RJ, Almond RG, Yan D, Steinberg LS (1999). Bayes nets in educational assessment: Where do the numbers come from? In: Laskey KB, Prade H (eds) Proc 15th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, pp 437–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols P, Chipman S, Brennen R (1995) Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino JW, Chudowski N, Glaser R (2001) Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckase MD (1997) The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement 21 (1): 25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samejima F (1995) A cognitive diagnosis method using latent trait models: Competency space approach and its relationship with DiBello and Stout’s unified cognitive-psychometric diagnosis model. In: Nichols P, Chipman S, Brennen R (eds) Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum, pp 391–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka KK (1985) A probabilistic model for diagnosing misconceptions by the pattern classification approach. J Educational Statistics 10: 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatamoka KK (1990) Toward an integration of item-response theory and cognitive error diagnosis. In Frederiksen N, Glaser R, Lesgold A, Shafto MG (eds) Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp 453–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka KK (1995) Architecture of knowledge structures and cognitive diagnosis: statistical pattern recognition and classification approach. In: Nichols P, Chipman S, Brennen R (eds) Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum. pp 327–359

    Google Scholar 

  • US Government (2001) No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Federal legislation

    Google Scholar 

  • VanEssen T (2001) Developing skills, descriptions and steps for improvement on a national standardized test. NCME presentation. Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley DE, Haertel EH (1996). Extended assessment tasks: Purposes, definitions, scoring, and accuracy. In Kane MB, Mitchell R (eds), Implementing performance assessments: Promises, problems, and challenges. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam D, Black PJ (1996) Meanings and consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? British Educational Research Journal, 22 (5), 537–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam D (2000, November) Integrating summative and formative functions of assessment. Paper presented at First annual conference of the Association for Educational Assessment-Europe held at Prague, Czech Republic

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M, Draney K (1997) Developing maps for student progress in the SEPUP Assessment System. U California, Berkeley: BEAR Report Series, SA-97–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto K (1989) HYBRID model of IRT and latent class models. Research Report. RR-89–41. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto K (1991) Performance modeling that integrates latent trait and class theory. Research Report. RR-91–01. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

H. Yanai A. Okada K. Shigemasu Y. Kano J. J. Meulman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

DiBello, L.V., Stout, W. (2003). Student Profile Scoring for Formative Assessment. In: Yanai, H., Okada, A., Shigemasu, K., Kano, Y., Meulman, J.J. (eds) New Developments in Psychometrics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66998-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66996-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics