Skip to main content

Factors which Influence Disclosure about Human Resources. An International Comparison Based on Disclosure Issued in Form 20-F and Annual Reports

  • Conference paper
New Developments in Psychometrics

Summary

At the present moment global capital markets need an international consensus about disclosure requirements in different stock exchanges. We are now witnessing a wide range of disclosure that does not belong to the fmancial statements but is issued with them. Recently the US-Securities Exchange Commission (US-SEC) has adopted international disclosure standards for foreign private issuers that will become mandatory for annual reports relating to fiscal years ending on or after September 30th, 2000.

Bearing in mind all of the above, we have examined 84 Annual Reports and Forms 20-F for 1998 and 1999 of European companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), in order to analyse with correspondence analysis, whether the disclosure policy about human resources depends on different factors. The results obtained show that there is a wide range of variety in this disclosure and that the most important difference is the one which distinguishes between the kinds of reporting, even though factors such as firm’s country of the origin shape the disclosure policy.

This work is part of the research project financed by the DGI: Influencia de la diversidad contable en el anáElisis financiero internacional. Un estudio empIrico (SEC2000-0410) in collaboration with Analistas Financieros Internacionales and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew BH, Gul FA, Guthrie JE, Teoh HY (1989) A note on corporate social disclosure practices in developing countries: The case of Malaysia and Singapore, BAR, Vol. 21, pp 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atiase RK (1987) Market Implications of Predisclosure Information: Size and Exchange Effects, JAR, Vol. 25, n°1, Spring, pp 168–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaglia S, Brightman C, Aked M (2000) The Increasing Importance of Industry Factors, FM, September/October, pp 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke TE (1989) Voluntary corporate disclosure by Swedish companies, JIFMA, Vol. 1, n°2, pp 171–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depoers F (2000) A cost-benefit study of voluntary disclosure: some empirical evidence from French listed Companies, EAR, Vol. 9, n°2, pp 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S (1995) Corporate social and environmental reporting-a review of the literature and longitudinal study of UK disclosure, AAAJ, Vol. 8, n°2, pp 47–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M (1994): “Correspondence Analysis and its Interpretation”, in Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Greenacre, M. and Blasius, J. London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuze JG, Newell GE, Newell SJ (1996) Environmental disclosures: What companies are reporting, MA, Jul, Vol. 78, Issue 1, pp 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn M (1992) A note on corporate social disclosure in Hong Kong, BAR, Vol. 24, pp 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nafez AB, Naser K (2000) Empirical evidence on corporate social disclosure (CSD) practices in Jordan, IJCM, Vol. 10, n°3 y4, pp 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage AA (1994) Corporate social disclosure practices in South Africa, social and environmental accounting. Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research, University of Dundee, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEC (1999) International Disclosure Standards, Final Rule S7–3–99 available on SEC web site at http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/34–41936.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh DR, Ahuja JM (1983) Corporate social reporting in India, IJAER, Vol. 18, pp 151169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street DL, Bryant SM (2000) Disclosure Level and Compaliance with IASs: A Comparison of Companies With and Without U.S. Listings and Filings, IJA, Vol. 35, n°3, pp 305329.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

H. Yanai A. Okada K. Shigemasu Y. Kano J. J. Meulman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Clavel, J.G., Ortiz, E., Martínez, I. (2003). Factors which Influence Disclosure about Human Resources. An International Comparison Based on Disclosure Issued in Form 20-F and Annual Reports. In: Yanai, H., Okada, A., Shigemasu, K., Kano, Y., Meulman, J.J. (eds) New Developments in Psychometrics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66998-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66996-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics