Skip to main content

A Backward Induction Computational Procedure to Sequential Mastery Testing

  • Conference paper
New Developments in Psychometrics
  • 636 Accesses

Summary

In a sequential mastery test, the decision is to classify a student as a master, a non-master, or to continue testing and administering another random item. Sequential mastery tests are designed with the goal of maximizing the probability of making correct classification decisions (i.e., mastery and non-mastery) while at the same time minimizing test length. The purpose of this paper is to derive optimal rules for sequential mastery tests. The framework of Bayesian sequential decision theory is used; that is, optimal rules are obtained by minimizing the posterior expected losses associated with all possible decision rules at each stage of testing. The main advantage of this approach is that costs of testing can be explicitly taken into account. Techniques of backward induction (i.e., dynamic programming) are used for computing optimal rules that minimize the posterior expected loss at each stage of testing. This technique starts by considering the final stage of testing and then works backward to the first stage of testing. For given maximum number of items to be administered, it is shown how the appropriate action can be computed at each stage of testing for different number-correct score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Angoff WH (1971) Scales, norms and equivalent scores. In: Thorndike RL (ed) Educational measurement, 3rd edn. Washington, American Council on Education, pp 508–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson RL (1969) The development, implementation, and evaluation of a computer-assisted branched test for a program of individually prescribed instruction. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson TS (1067) Mathematical statistics: a decision theoretic approach. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann EL (1959) Testing statistical hypotheses, and edn. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis C, Sheehan K (1990) Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computerized mastery test. Applied Psychological Measurement 14: 367–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce RD, Raiffa H (1957) Games and decisions. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Novick MR, Lindley DV (1979) The use of more realistic utility functions in educational applications. Journal of Educational Measurement 15: 181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1930) Tables for statisticians and biometricians. Cambridge University Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden WJ, Vos HJ (1996) A compensatory approach to optimal selection with mastery scores. Psychometrika 61: 155–172

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vos FU (1997) Simultaneous optimization of quota-restricted selection decisions with mastery scores. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 50: 105125

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald A (1947) Sequential analysis. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RR (1981) A review of the beta-binomial model and its extensions. Journal of Educational Statistics 6: 3–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

H. Yanai A. Okada K. Shigemasu Y. Kano J. J. Meulman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vos, H.J. (2003). A Backward Induction Computational Procedure to Sequential Mastery Testing. In: Yanai, H., Okada, A., Shigemasu, K., Kano, Y., Meulman, J.J. (eds) New Developments in Psychometrics. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66996-8_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66998-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66996-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics