Summary
The mechanisms by which emmetropia might be reached in growing eyes is discussed. Although emmetropia might result from normal developmental processes causing eyes to be a certain shape, the preponderance of evidence, especially from the accurate compensation for varying degrees of hyperopic and myopic defocus imposed by spectacle lenses, argues that the visual responses of the eye guide it toward emmetropia by means of a feedback mechanism. Little is known about the details of this control of eye growth, or what the error signal might be that indicates whether the eye is myopic or hyperopic, but there are clues that restrict the possibilities. The hypothesis that compensation is accomplished simply by the rate of ocular elongation being determined by the average amount of blurred or sharp vision, making lens compensation a special case of deprivation myopia, is not supported by most evidence available at present.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Schaeffel F, Glasser A, Howland HC (1988) Accommodation, refractive error, and eye growth in chickens. Vision Res 28:639–657
Irving EL, Callender MG, Sivak JG (1991) Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks. Optom Vision Sci 68:364–368
Siegwart JT, Norton TT (1993) Refractive and ocular changes in tree shrews raised with plus or minus lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (ARVO Suppl) 34:1208
Hung L-F, Crawford MLJ, Smith EL (1995) Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nature Med 1:761–765
Judge S, Graham B (1995) Differential ocular growth of infant marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) eyes induced by optical anisometropia combined with alternating occlusion. J Physiol 485P:27P
McFadden S, Wallman J (1995) Guinea pig eye growth compensates for spectacle lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (ARVO Suppl) 36:758
Diether S, Schaeffel F (1996) Local changes in eye growth after imposed local defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ( A RVO Sunnl) 37:S1000
Nickla D, Gottlieb M, Wildsoet C, et al. (1992) Myopic and hyperopic blur cause opposite changes in proteoglycan synthesis of sclera and choroid. Exp Eye Res (Int Loner Eve Res Supol) 55:S109
Wildsoet C, Wallman J (1995) Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res 35:1175–1194
Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, et al. (1995) Moving the retina: Choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res 35:37–50
Bartmann M, Schaeffel F, Hagel G, et al. (1994) Constant light affects retinal dopamine levels and blocks deprivation myopia but not lens-induced refractive errors in chicks. Vis Neurosci 11:199–208
Li T, Troilo D, Glasser A, et al. (1995) Constant light produces severe corneal flattening and hyperopia in chickens. Vision Res 35:1203–1209
Troilo D, Gottlieb MD, Wallman J (1987) Visual deprivation causes myopia in chicks with optic nerve section. Curr Eve Res 6:993–999
Wildsoet CF, Pettigrew JD (1988) Experimental myopia and anomalous eye growth patterns unaffected by optic nerve section in chickens: Evidence for local control of eye growth. Clin Vis Sci 3:99–107
Curtin BJ (1985) The myopias: Basic science and clinical management. Harper and Row, Philadelphia
Schaeffel F, Troilo D, Wallman J, et al. (1990) Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus. Vis Neurosci 4:177–183
Rohrer B, Schaeffel F, Zrenner E (1992) Longitudinal chromatic aberration and emmetropization: Results from the chicken eye. J Physiol 449:363–376
Zadnik K, Mutti DO (1995) How applicable are animal myopia models to human juvenile-onset myopia. Vision Res 35:1283–1288
Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Adams AJ (1996) Myopia: The nature versus nurture debate goes on. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:952–957
Nickla DL, Panos SN, Fugate-Wentzek LA, et al. (1989) What attributes of visual stimulation determine whether chick eyes develop deprivation myopia? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (ARVO Suppl) 30:31
Napper GA, Brennan NA, Barrington M, et al. (1995) The duration of normal visual exposure necessary to prevent form deprivation myopia in chicks. Vision Res 35:1337–1344
Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF (1996) Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve-section in chicks. Vision Res 36:1023–1036
Gottlieb MD, Wallman J (1987) Retinal activity modulates eye growth: Evidence from rearing in stroboscopic illumination. Soc Neurosci Abstr 13:1297
Schmid DL, Wildsoet CF (1996) Inhibitory effects of stroboscopic light on formdeprivation and lens-induced myopias show different frequency tuning and patterns of axial change in chick. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (ARVO Suppl) 37:S686
Stone RA, Lin T, Laties AM (1991) Muscarinic antagonist effects on experimental chick myopia. Exp Eye Res 52:755–758
Li XX, Schaeffel F, Kohler K, et al. (1992) Dose-dependent effects of 6-hydroxydopamine on deprivation myopia, electroretinograms, and dopaminergic amacrine cells in chickens. Vis Neurosci 9:483–492
McBrien N, Moghaddam HO, Reeder AP (1993) Atropine reduces experimental myopia and eye enlargement via a nonaccommodative mechanism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:205–215
Schwahn HN, Schaeffel F (1994) Chick eyes under cycloplegia compensate for spectacle lenses despite six-hydroxydopamine treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:3516–3524
Wildsoet CF, McBrien NA, Clark IQ (1994) Atropine inhibition of lens-induced effects in chick: Evidence for similar mechanisms underlying form deprivation and lensinduced myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (ARVO Sunni) 35:2068
Schaeffel F, Bartmann M, Hagel G, et al. (1995) Studies on the role of the retinal dopamine/melatonin system in experimental refractive errors in chickens. Vision Res 35:1247–1264
Schwahn HN, Schaeffel F, Zrenner E (1996) Effects of flickering light of varying duty cycles on the refractive development of chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (ARVO Suppl) 37:51000
Schaeffel F, Hagel G, Bartmann M, et al. (1994) 6-hydroxydopamine does not affect lens-induced refractive errors but suppresses deprivation myopia. Vision Res 34:143–149
Rickers M, Schaeffel F (1995) Dose-dependent effects of intravitreal pirenzepine on deprivation myopia and lens-induced refractive errors in chickens. Exp Eye Res 61:509–516
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wallman, J. (1998). How Is Emmetropization Controlled? Results of Research on Experimental Myopia. In: Tokoro, T. (eds) Myopia Updates. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66959-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66959-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66961-6
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66959-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive