Skip to main content

Limitations of the Emmetropization Process in Infant Monkeys

  • Conference paper
Myopia Updates II

Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the effective operating range for the emmetropization process and the refractive errors that consistently produced amblyopia. Infant rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta, n = 46) were reared with Positive or negative lenses over one or both eyes. Retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography were used to evaluate the effect of optically induced changes in refractive state on ocular development. For representative monkeys, spatial contrast sensitivity functions were measured for each eye using a behavioral psychophysical paradigm. For low-powered (± 3 D), but not high-powered, anisometropic lenses (≥ 6 D), infants exhibited differential interocular axial growth rates that eliminated the lens-induced imbalance between the two eyes. Infants that failed to compensate for the induced anisometropia developed amblyopia in their non-fixating eyes. However, by combining anisometropic lenses with an alternating occlusion regimen that reduced the likelihood of amblyopia, it was possible to extend the emmetropization mechanism’s operating range. Bilateral equal-powered lenses that resulted in effective refractive errors between about −2 and +8 D predictably altered axial growth and the course of emmetropization. However, within this range, infants with high degrees of bilateral, hyperopia frequently developed anisometropia and in some cases amblyopia. Anisometropic refractive errors that exceed the effective operating range for emmetropization consistently produce amblyopia, which supports the idea that anisometropia causes amblyopia. However, factors associated with the development of early sensory and/or oculomotor anomalies also influence the ability of the eye to respond to optical defocus and can lead to anisometropia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wildsoet, C. F. (1997) Active emmetropization–evidence for its existence and ramifications for clinical practice. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 17: 279–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hung, L.-F., Crawford, M. L. J. and Smith III, E. L. (1995) Sf lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nature Medicine I: 761–765.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith III, E. L. and Hung, L.F. (1999) The role of optic I d,:us in regulating refractive deveiopment in infant monkeys. Vision Research 39: 1415–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Quick, M. W., Tigges, M., Gammon, J. A. and Boothe, R..I Early abnormal visual experience induces strabismus in infant monkeys. Inve thalmology and Visual Science 30: 1012–4017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith III, E. L., Harwerth, R. S. and Crawford, M. L. J. (1985)–st eersitivity deficits in monkeys produced by optically induced anisometropia. ephthalmolgy and Visual Science 26: 330–342.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Atkinson, J. (1993) Infant vision screening: Prediction of strabismus and amblyopia from refractive screening in the Cambridge Ph)grarn, In: Simons, K. (ed) Early Visual Development, Normal and Abnormal. I Si Uìersity Press, New York ), pp 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith III, E. L., Hung, L.-F. and Harwerth, R. S. (1994) Effects of optically induced blur on the refractive status of young monkeys. Vision Research 34: 293–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith III, E. L., Hung, L.-F. and Harwerth, R. S. (1998) Develop, ‘al visual system anomalies and the limits of emmetropization. Ophthalmic and Physiologic, 19: 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levi, D. M. and Carkeet, A. (1993) Amblyopia: A consequence c’ normal visual development In: Simons, K. (ed) Early Visual Development, Normal and Abnormal. Oxf-rd University Press, New York), pp 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abrahamsson, M. and Sjöstrand, J. (1996) Natural history of infantile anisorm na. British Journal of Ophthalmology 80: 860–863.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiorpes, L. and Willman, J. (1995) Does experimentally-induced amblyopie caw._ hyperopia in monkeys? Vision Research 35: 1289–1297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smith, E.L., Hung, LF., Harwerth, R.S. (2000). Limitations of the Emmetropization Process in Infant Monkeys. In: Lin, L.LK., Shih, YF., Hung, P.T. (eds) Myopia Updates II. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66917-3_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66917-3_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-70275-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66917-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics