Skip to main content

Myopia: Nature, Nurture, and the Blur Hypothesis

  • Conference paper
Myopia Updates II
  • 127 Accesses

Summary

Both inheritance and visual experience contribute to the de of myopia. The blur hypothesis, which asserts that myopia may be iuduced by ahnormal levels of or sensitivity to retinal image blur, can be used to describe how nature may work together to induce myopia. Each physiological mechanism that in uceu blurred vision may be inherited and most of these can act as parallel causal links connecting near work with the mechanisms that translate a blurred image into axial myopia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pacella R, McLellan J, Grice K, Del Bono EA, Wiggs JL, Gwiazda JE (1999) Role of genetic factors in the etiology of juvenile-onset myopia based on a longitudinal study of refractive error. Optom.Vis.Sci 76: 381–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R (1993) Emmetropization and the progression of refractive errors in children followed from infancy to puberty. Clinical Visual Sci 8: 337–344

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thorn F, Cruz AAV, Machado AJ.and Carvaiho RC (1998) Refractive status of indigenous people deep within the Amazon rain forest. In Vision science and its applications, Vol. 1. Optical Society of America Technical Digest Series, 194–197

    Google Scholar 

  4. Troilo D, Li T, Glasser A, Howland HC (1995) Differences in eye growth and the response to visual deprivation in different strains of chicken. Vision Res 35: 1211–1216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith E (1998) Spectacle lenses and emmetropization: the role of optical defocus in regulating ocular development. Optom.Vis Sci 75: 388–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thorn F, Cameron L, Arnel J, Thorn S (1998) Myopic adults see through defocus better than emmetropes. In: Tokoro T (ed) Myopia updates. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 368–374

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Gwiazda J, Grice K, Thorn F (1999) Response AC/A ratios are elevated in myopic children. Ophthal Physiol Opt 19: 173–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fulk GW, Cyert LA (1996) Can bifocals slow myopia progression? J Am Opt Assoc. 67: 749–754

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thorn, F., Grice, K., Held, R., Gwiazda, J. (2000). Myopia: Nature, Nurture, and the Blur Hypothesis. In: Lin, L.LK., Shih, YF., Hung, P.T. (eds) Myopia Updates II. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66917-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66917-3_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-70275-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66917-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics