Skip to main content

Prejunctional Actions of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs

  • Conference paper
Book cover Muscle Relaxants
  • 208 Accesses

Abstract

The major action of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents is that they are competitive antagonists at the skeletal muscle postjunctional nicotinic receptor. In addition, they also block acetylcholine receptors in the autonomic nervous system, including muscarinic receptors at the sino-atrial node, and nicotinic receptors at ganglia. As well as blocking the muscle postjunctional nicotinic receptors, large concentrations can produce non-competitive block by occluding the endplate channel itself. The well-known phenomena of tetanic fade and train-of-four fade have been ascribed to a prejunctional action of the compounds. This is controversial. It has been argued that the prime prejunctional effect of, for example, tubocurarine, is to reduce transmitter mobilization. Others have argued that the prime effect is to increase release. This paper describes how different elements of our research effort over the years have led to a hypothesis that attempts to unify some of these apparently contradictory views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dale HH, Feldberg W, Vogt M. Release of acetylcholine at voluntary motor nerve endings. Journal of Physiology 1936; 86: 353–380.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lingle CJ, Steinbach JH. Neuromuscular blocking. agents. International Anesthesiology Clinics 1988; 26: 288–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Glavinovic MI. Presynaptic action of curare. Journal of Physiology 1979; 290: 499–506.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Magleby KL, Pallotta BS, Terrar DA. The effect of (+)-tubocurarine on neuromuscular transmission during repetitive stimulation in the rat, mouse, and frog. Journal of Physiology 1981; 312: 97–113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibb AJ, Marshall IG. Pre- and post-junctional effects of tubocurarine and other nicotinic antagonists during repetitive stimulation in the rat. Journal of Physiology 1984; 351: 275–297.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowman WC. Prejunctional and postjunctional cholinoceptors at the neuromuscular junction. Anaesthesia and Analgesia 1980; 59: 935–943.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson DF. Influence of presynaptic receptors on neuromuscular transmission in rat. American Journal of Physiology 1982; 242: C366–372.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes R, Chapple DJ. Effects of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents on peripheral autonomic mechanisms in cats. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1976; 48: 59–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes R, Chapple DJ. The pharmacology of atracurium: a new competitive neuromuscular blocking agent. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1981; 53: 31–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Durant NN, Marshall IG, Savage DS, Nelson DJ, Sleigh T, Carlyle IC. The neuromuscular and autonomic blocking activities of pancuronium, Org NC45, and other pancuronium analogues, in the cat. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 1979; 31: 831–836.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brittan RT, Levy GP, Tyers MB. The neuromuscular blocking action of 2-(4-phenylpiperidino) cyclohexanol (AH5183). European Journal of Pharmacology 1969; 8: 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marshall IG. A comparison between the blocking actions of 2-(4-phenylpiperidino) cyclohexanol (AH5183) and its n-methyl quaternary analogue (AH5954). British Journal of Pharmacology 1970; 40: 68–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marshall IG. Studies on the blocking action of 2-(4-phenylpiperidino) cyclohexanol (AH5183). British Journal of Pharmacology 1970; 38: 503–516.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Parsons SM, Koenigsberger R. Specific stimulated uptake of acetylcholine by Torpedo organ synaptic vesicles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 1980; 77: 6234–6238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall IG, Parsons SM. The vesicular acetylcholine transport system. Trends in Neuroscience 1987; 10: 174–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Parsons SM, Prior C, Marshall IG. Acetylcholine transport, storage, and release. International Review of Neurobiology 1993; 35: 279–390.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Searl T, Prior C, Marshall IG. The effects of L-vesamicol, an inhibitor of vesicular acetylcholine uptake, on two populations of miniature end-plate currents at the snake neuromuscular junction. Neuroscience 1990; 35: 145–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Searl T, Prior C, Marshall IG. Acetylcholine recycling and release at rat motor nerve terminals studied using (-)-vesamicol and troxypyrrolium. Journal of Physiology 1991; 444: 99–116.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pemberton KE, Prior C, Marshall IG. The effects of vesamicol on trains of endplate currents and on focally recorded nerve terminal currents at mammalian neuromuscular junctions. British Journal of Pharmacology 1992; 105: 112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tian L, Prior C, Marshall IG. Nicotinic antagonist-produced frequencydependent changes in acetylcholine release from rat motor nerve terminals. Journal of Physiology 1994; 476: 517–529.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz B, Miledi R. Transmitter leakage from motor nerve endings. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) 1977; 196: 59–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marshall, I.G., Prior, C., Dempster, J., Tian, L. (1995). Prejunctional Actions of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs. In: Fukushima, K., Ochiai, R. (eds) Muscle Relaxants. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66896-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66896-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66898-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66896-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics