Skip to main content

Problems with Reversal in Adults

  • Conference paper
  • 205 Accesses

Abstract

Griffith and Johnson’s original description [1] of the use of tubocurarine shows them to have had an anticholinesterase available but not to have used it. Their patients did not need artificial ventilation and appeared to suffer no ill effects. But when I started training in the early 1960’s the doses used were greater, artificial ventilation was almost universal when relaxants were used as were anticholinesterases — and some patients showed the problem of ’neostigmine-resistant curarization’. Beecher and Todd’s study [2] implicated relaxants as a cause of death. Harrison [3] claimed that some twenty percent of deaths associated with anaesthesia were due to the misuse of relaxants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Griffith, H.R., Johnson, E. The use of curare in general anaesthesia. Anesthesiology 1942; 3: 418–420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beecher, H. K., Todd, D. P. Study of deaths associated with anesthesia and surgery based on a study of 599,548 anesthesias in 10 institutions 1948–1952 inclusive. Annals of Surgery 1954; 140: 2–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrison,G.G. Death attributable to anaesthesia; its incidence and the commoner causes. In Lectures in Anesthesiology No 2 (ed. J.S.M. Zorab), p15. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shorten,G.D. Postoperative residual curarisation: incidence, aetiology and associated morbidity. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1993; 21: 782–789.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bevan, D. R., Donati, F., Kopman, A. F. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 785–805.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Viby-Mogensen, J., Jensen, N. H., Engbaek, J., Ording, H., Skovgaard, L. T., Chraemmer Jorgensen,B. Tactile and visual estimation of the response to train-of-four stimulation. Anesthesiology 1985; 63: 440–443.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Engbaek, J., Ostergaard, D., Viby-Mogensen, J. Double burst stimulation (DBS) : a new pattern of nerve stimulation to identify residual neuromuscular block. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1989; 62: 274–278.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Viby-Mogensen,J., Jorgensen, B. C., Ording, H. Residual curarization in the recovery room. Anesthesiology 1979; 50:539–.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bevan, D. R., Smith, C. E., Donati, F. Postoperative neuromuscular blockade: a comparison between atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Anesthesiology 1988; 32:272–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Norman, J. (1995). Problems with Reversal in Adults. In: Fukushima, K., Ochiai, R. (eds) Muscle Relaxants. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66896-1_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66896-1_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66898-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66896-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics