Advertisement

Pelvimetry

  • Katsuhiko Aoki
  • Tokuroh Nobechi
  • Osamu Doi
  • Etsuko Fujimaki
  • Tomikazu Mizuno

Abstract

X-ray pelvimetry was performed on 19 subjects using computed radiography (CR) and on 100 sub­jects using a conventional screen/film (SF) system. CR enables the accurate identification of measuring points through image processing at a low dose; the accuracy obtained with CR in predicting the rela­tionship between cephalopelvic disproportion and subsequent cesarean section was better than that with the conventional system. CR is an important new radiological examination modality whereby better images can be obtained at a lower dose, thereby drastically reducing the radiological expo­sure to both mother and fetus.

Keywords

Cesarian Section Spatial Frequency Exposure Dose Compute Radiography Fetal Head 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pinard, Varnier (1897) Beckenphotographie und Beckenmessung mittels X-Strahlen. Zentralbl Gynäk 21: 1145Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Albert (1899) Verwertung von Röntgenstrahlen für die praktische Geburtshilfe. Berlin Klin Wchnschr 36: 535Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sawasaki S (1968) Cephalo-pelvic disproportion index. Sanka to Fujinka (Obstetrics and Gynecology) 43: 833–840Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stewart Am, Kueale GW (1970) Age-distribution of cancer caused by obstetric X-rays and their relevance to cancer latent periods. Lancet II: 4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iba S, Satoh K, (1983) Estimation of foetus risk from X-ray pelvimetric examinations. Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 39 (6): 862–870Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russell JGB, Hufton A, Pritchard C (1980) Technical notes, gridless (low radiation dose) pelvimetry. Br J Radiol. 53: 233–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hatanaka M, Koyama Y, Akashi K, Kusakai K, Sumita K (1983) A new method of X-ray pelvimetry. Fuji Med Forum 142: 24–26Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watanabe Y, Itoh E, Kitamura M, Ikawa M, Miyasaka Y, Hachiya J, (1983) Dose reduction in X-ray pelvimetry ( Martius method) using Fuji computed radiography. Fuji Med Forum 143: 15–18Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Federle MP, Cohen HA, Rosenwein MF, BrantZawadzki MN, Cann CE (1982) Pelvimetry by digital radiology: A low-dose examination. Radiology 143: 733–735Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCarthy SM, Stark DD, Filly RA, Callen PW, Hricak H, Higgins CB (1985) Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: Maternal anatomy 1. Radiology 154 (2): 421–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Stark DD, Hricak H, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Callen PW, Higgins CB (1985) Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: Fetal anatomy 1. Radiology 154 (2): 427–432PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katsuhiko Aoki
    • 1
  • Tokuroh Nobechi
    • 2
  • Osamu Doi
    • 2
  • Etsuko Fujimaki
    • 2
  • Tomikazu Mizuno
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyShizuoka Children’s HospitalShizuoka, 420Japan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologySt. Luke’s International Hospital in TokyoChuo-ku, Tokyo, 104Japan

Personalised recommendations