Since the images provided by computed radiography (CR) are generally easier to evaluate than the images obtained with the conventional X-ray technique, both mammography and neck roentgenography would appear to be good applications for CR. However, in a strict sense, CR is poor in its capacity to depict the fine detail of microcalcifications in the breast compared with the nonscreen technique. It seems that this problem comes from the limitation of the spatial resolution with the present equipment.
KeywordsDust Adenocarcinoma Lution Reso Kato
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Takano M (1982) New computed radiography Fuji Intelligent Diagnostic X-ray system. Journal of Medical Imagings 2: 202–207Google Scholar
- 2.Hachiya J, Kato H (1982) Digital radiography using imaging plate.: Digital radiography Perspective for clinical applications. Akisada M (ed.) Life science center Co. TokyoGoogle Scholar
- 3.Hachiya J, Koranaga T, Sakurai K, Sakai F, Kato K, Takano M (1982) New method of digital angiography. Japanese Jaurnal of Clinical Radiology 27: 705–710Google Scholar
- 4.Sakurai K, Hachiya J, Korenaga T, Nitatori T, Miyasaka Y, Furuya Y (1984) Digital radiography of the chest—Evaluation of normal anatomical structure and low dose radiography Nippon Acta Radiologica 44: 11–22Google Scholar
- 5.Okazaki M (1982) Mammography. Medical imaging lecture series [II] Nagai T (ed.) Asakura shoten 3–40Google Scholar
- 6.Ohara T, Fujimoto Y (1983) Imaging diagnosis of discase of thyroid Journal of Medical Imagings 3: 128–135Google Scholar