Alan Turing and “The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis”
A. M. Turing (1912–1954) was one of the foremost thinkers of the 20th century. He contributed at least three original ideas in his life, a claim that not many can make. They were the ‘Turing machine’, the ‘Turing test’ and the ‘Turing instability’. The aim of this article is to make some comments on the last of these. It forms part of the only biological work by him published in his lifetime, entitled “The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis” , My comments begin as questions pertaining to its background, immediate reception and subsequent impact from the viewpoint of biology. No attempt is made to discuss the mathematical aspects of Turing’s analysis, interesting as they are because to do so would be redundant for the readers of this volume. This being Turing’s sole publication dealing with a conventional biological problem (i.e., ignoring for the moment what he had to say on the question of Mind), I will use “Turing’s paper” and “Turing’s contribution to biology” as if the two terms were interchangeable. Strictly speaking, this is not correct. Ward-law  finished and wrote up on his own the ideas about phyllotaxis that he had been discussing with Turing. There is also a volume of Turing’s Collected Works that includes later, incomplete developments on morphogenesis which appeared after his death . More pertinently, neither contains essential information bearing on our assessment of The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis — which, after all, is the only thing that Turing did that many biologists know, or know about.
KeywordsPattern Formation Chemical Basis Turing Model Turing Instability Biological Form
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Child, C. M. (1941). Patterns and Problems in Development University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
- 4.D’Arcy Thompson, W. (1917; 1942; 1971 ). On Growth and Form. (Abridged edition) J. T. Bonner, ed., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 5.Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- 9.Keller, E. F. (2002). Making Sense of Life Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Kolmogorov A. N., Petrovski, I. G. and Piskunov, N. S. (1937). Study of the diffusion equation with a concentration-dependent source term and an application to a biological problem. Moscow Univ. Bull. Ser. Internat. Sect. A 1: 1–25. (in Russian)Google Scholar
- 12.Maynard Smith, J. (1968). Mathematical Ideas in Biology Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 13.McNally, J. G. and Cox, E. C. (1989). Spots and stripes: the patterning spectrum in the cellular slime mould Polysphondylium pallidum. Development 105: 323–333.Google Scholar
- 15.Newman, S. A. (1993). Is segmentation generic? BioEssays 15: 277–283.Google Scholar
- 18.Rashevsky, N. (1960). Mathern.atical Biophysics: Physico-Mathernatical Foundations of Biology, Vols. 1, 2. New York: Dover, 1960.Google Scholar
- 19.Rose, S. M. (1952). A hierarchy of self-limiting reactions as the basis of cellular differentiation and growth control. Alm. Nat. LXXXVI: 337–354.Google Scholar
- 22.Stern, C. (1968). Genetic Mosaics and Other Essays. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 25.Waddington, C. H. (1962). Patterns and Problems in Development. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar