Advertisement

Formation of a Structure of Exponentially Forking Branches with a Steady-state Amount of Current-year Shoots in a Hardwood Tree Crown

  • Akihiro Sumida
  • Yuri Takai

Abstract

Forking branches are a structural pattern characterizing a tree species. For a tree species, as a sessile organism, the forking structure is essential for gaining solar energy by spreading leaves in lighter spaces as quickly as possible. The structure is an outcome of a process in which a mother shoot of a branch produces multiple daughter shoots, and thus allows a tree to exponentially increase the amount of leaves available for photosynthetic production. On the other hand, in closed hardwood forests, tree crowns are so close to each other that there is very little space for “exponential” expansion of tree crowns [8]. How can the nature of branch forking, which appears to result in an exponential increase of leaf amount, be consistent with crown development in closed hardwood stands where crown expansion is limited due to a lack of available space? To answer such a question, analyses of demographic (birth and death) and morphological patterns of annual shoots (the portion of shoots elongated during a year) in tree crowns are useful, since they can clarify how the shoot population in a crown develops and is maintained [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Here, we begin by showing an example of the structural pattern of a branch as observed in the top canopy of a closed hardwood forest. We then show how the observed pattern can be formed by introducing a model simulating demographic and structural patterns of the annual shoots.

Keywords

Structural Pattern Tree Crown Stable Cluster Lateral Shoot Annual Shoot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Buck-Sorlin, G.H., and Bell, A.D. (2000). Crown architecture in Quercus petraea and Q.robur: the fate of buds and shoots in relation to age, position and environmental perturbation. Forestry, 73, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaar, H., Colin, F., and Collet, C. (1997). Effects of environmental factors on the shoot development of Quercus petraea seedlings. A methodological approach. For Feat Manage, 97, 119–131.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collet, C., and Frochot, H. (1996). Effects of interspeciric competition on periodic shoot elongation in oak seedlings. Can J For Res, 26, 1934–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kira, T., Shinozaki, K., and Hozumi, K. (1969). Structure of forest canopies as related to their primary productivity. Plant Cell Physiol, 10, 129–142.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koike, F. (1989). Foliage-crown development and interaction in Quercus gilva and Q.acuta. J Ecol, 77, 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sattler, R., and Rutishauser, R. (1997). The fundamental relevance of morphology and morphogenesis to plant research. Ann Bot, 80, 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steingraeber, D.A., Kascht, L.J., and Franck, D.H. (1979). Variation of shoot morphology and bifurcation ratio in sugar maple (Acer saccharwm) saplings. Amer J Bot, 66, 441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sumida, A., Terazawa, I., Togashi, A., and Komiyama, A. (2002). Spatial arrangement of branches in relation to slope and neighbourhood competition. Ann Bot, 89, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suzuki, A. (2000). Patterns of vegetative growth and reproduction in relation to branch orders: the plant as a spatially structured population. Trees, 14, 329–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suzuki, M. (2001). Allornetry and Dynamics of Current-year Shoot Populations in the Crown Development of Deciduous Trees, Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Earth Environmental Science, Hokkaido University.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seleznyova, A.N., Thorp, T.G., Barnett, A.M., and Costes, E. (2002). Quantitative analysis of shoot development and branching patterns in Actinidia. Ann Bot, 89, 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    White, J. (1979). The plant as a metapopulation. ATM Rev Boot Syst, 10, 109–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson, B.F. (1989). Tree branches as population of twigs. Can J Bot, 67, 434–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akihiro Sumida
    • 1
  • Yuri Takai
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Low Temperature ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureGifu UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations