A Technique for Setting Standards and Maintaining Them over Time
This paper describes a new procedure for standard setting based on item response maps (“Wright maps”). Motivation for the technique is discussed, and variants of the item response formulation are shown. An example based on the Golden State Examinations is used as a context for the discussion, and for some results.
KeywordsCommittee Member Proficiency Level Multiple Choice Item Construct Mapping Polytomous Item
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Draney, K., & Wilson, M. (1998, June). Creating composite scores and setting performance levels: Use of a scaling procedure. Council of Chief State School Officers National Conference on Large Scale Assessment, Colorado Springs, CO.Google Scholar
- Jaeger, R. M., Plake B. S., & Hambleton, R. K. (1993). Integrating multidimensional performance and setting performance standards. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
- Wilson, M. (1994). Assessment nets: An alternative approach to assessment in mathematics education. In T. Romberg (Ed.), Assessment in School Mathematics New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, M., & Draney, K. (1998, June. Creating composite scores and setting performance levels: Comparison of raw score and scaling procedures. Council of Chief State School Officers National Conference on Large Scale Assessment, Colorado Springs, CO.Google Scholar
- Wu, M., Adams, R. J., & Wilson M. (1998). ACER-Conquest [computer program and manual]. Hawthorn, Australia: ACER PressGoogle Scholar