Skip to main content

Measures and Admissibilities for the Structure of Clustering

  • Conference paper
Measurement and Multivariate Analysis

Summary

The problem of selecting a clustering algorithm from the myriad of algorithms has been discussed in recent years. Many researchers have attacked this problem by using the concept of admissibility (e.g. Fisher and Van Ness, 1971, Yadohisa, et al., 1999). We propose a new criterion called the “structured ratio” for measuring the clustering results. It includes the concept of the well-structured admissibility as a special case, and represents some kind of “goodness-of-fit” of the clustering result. New admissibilities of the clustering algorithm and a new agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm are also provided by using the structured ratio. Details of the admissibilities of the eight popular algorithms are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Fisher, L. and Van Ness, J. (1971), Admissible clustering procedures, Biometrika, 58, 91–104.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D. (1996), Hierarchical classification, In: clustering and classification, P. Arabie, L. Hubert and G. Soete (Eds.), World Scientific, New Jersey, 65–121.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J. A. (1967), Representation of similarity matrices by trees, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 1140–1158.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N. and Sibson, R. (1971), Mathematical taxonomy, London, Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lance, G. N. and Williams, W. T. (1967), A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies: 1. hierarchical systems, The Computer Journal, 9, 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1967), Optimal classification into groups: an approach for solving the taxonomy problem, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 15, 103–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1962), The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods, Taxon, 11, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadohisa, H., Takeuchi, A. and Inada, K. (1999), Developing criteria for measuring space distortion in combinatorial cluster analysis and methods for controlling the distortion, Journal of Classification, 16, 45–62.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Takeuchi, A., Yadohisa, H., Inada, K. (2002). Measures and Admissibilities for the Structure of Clustering. In: Nishisato, S., Baba, Y., Bozdogan, H., Kanefuji, K. (eds) Measurement and Multivariate Analysis. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65955-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65955-6_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-65957-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-65955-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics