Time Dependent Principal Component Analysis

  • Yasumasa Baba
  • Takahiro Nakamura
Conference paper


Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is one of the useful descriptive methods for multivariate data. One aim of the methods is to construct new variables by a linear combination from original variables and illustrate the structure of variables and individuals on a new space based on new variables. In this method principal components have some meanings to summarize variables. Suppose that we obtained principal components at two time points. Then principal components obtained from data at different times will have different meanings if linear combinations of variables are different. For example, the first principal component at time 1 and that at time 2 do not always have the same meanings, as seen in the following example. The first principal component at time 1 may appear as the second or the third principal component at time 2, thus changing the meanings of the first principal components from two time points. Therefore care must be exercised for the interpretation of results from different time points.

In this paper we will propose a method to connect smoothly principal components or loadings from different time points.


Principal Component Analysis Data Matrix Multivariate Data American Statistical Association Descriptive Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, T. W. (1963). Asymptotic theory for principal component analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 122–148.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Baba, Y. and Nakamura, N. (1997). Time dependent Principal component analysis(in Japanese), 11’ h Annual Meeting of Japanese Computational Statistics Society, 82–85.Google Scholar
  3. Flury, B.D. (1984). Common principal components in k groups. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 892–898.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Flury, B. D. (1995). Developments in principal component analysis. In Krzanowski, W. J. (Ed.) Recent Advances in Descriptive Multivariate Analysis. Clarendon Press: Oxford. pp 14–33.Google Scholar
  5. Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417–441, 498–520.Google Scholar
  6. Jollife, 1. T. (1986). Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krzanowski, W. J. (1979). Between-group comparison of principal components. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 703–707. (Correction note: (1981), 76, 1022 ).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, Series 6, 2, 559–572.Google Scholar
  9. Statistics Bureau Management and Coordination Agency Government of Japan(1988,1993). Annual Report of the Family Income and Expenditure Survey 1987, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. Thorpe, R. S. (1983). A review of numerical methods for recognizing and analyzing racial differentiation. In Felsenstein, J. (Ed.) Numerical Taxonomy. Springer, New York., pp 404–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasumasa Baba
    • 1
  • Takahiro Nakamura
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Statistical MathematicsMinato-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations