Advertisement

Comparison of some numerical data between the belisama group of the genus Delias Hübner (Insecta: Lepidoptera) from Bali Island, Indonesia

  • Sadaharu Morinaka
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Summary

In taxonomic study of closely related taxa, numerical data seem to be insufficiently used or discussed. In this study actual sizes of various parts in male genitalia and their ratios (to forewing length) are compared and discussed. Generally ratios are considered to be useful for eliminating the environmental effects, as seen in the case that male genitalia of Delias oraia are proved clearly larger than those of Delias belisama. Meanwhile it is clarified through the discussion that there are such a character that is hardly effected by the environment, and that is therefore very important to discuss the speciation and biological evolution in related taxa.

Keywords

Biological Evolution Related Taxon Male Genitalia Classification Society Phallus Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D’Abrera, B. (1986): Butterflies of the Oriental Region, Part 3. Lycaenidae and Riodinidae, Hill House, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  2. Kimura, M., 1960. An outline of Population Genetics, Baihûkan, Tokyo (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  3. Komatsu, T. (1996): Morphometric study on stochastic processes and deterministic processes in evolution. Why do insect genitalia differentiate?, Fifth conference of International Federation of Classification Societies. Abstracts, 2, 212–215.Google Scholar
  4. Lande, R. (1976): Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotipic evolution, Evolution, 30, 314–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lynch, M. (1988): The rate of polygenetic mutatio, Genetical research, 51, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Morinaka, S. (1988): A Study on the Belisama Group of the Genus Delias from Bali, Indonesia (1), Tyo to Ga, 3 9, 2, 137–148 (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  7. Morinaka, S. (1990): Ditto (2), - Comparison of Male Genitalia between Delias belisama balina and D. oraia bratana -, Tyo to Ga, 41, 3, 139–147 (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  8. Morinaka, S. (1996): Comparison of some numerical data between the belisama group of the genus Delias Hübner (Insecta: Lepidoptera) from Bali Island, Indonesia. Fifth conference of International Federation of Classification Societies. Abstracts, 2, 302–305.Google Scholar
  9. Morinaka, S. (1996): Comparison of some numerical data of genitalia relating to the speciation, 43rd Annual Meeting of the Lepidopterological Society of Japan, Abstracts, 50 (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  10. Talbot, G. (1928–1937): A Monograph of the Pierine genus Delias,British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
  11. Yagishita, A., S. Nakano and S. Monta. (1993): An illustrated list of the Genus Delias Hübner of the World, Nishiyama, Y (ed), Khepera Publishers, Singapore (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. Yata, O. and K. Morishita. (1981): Butterflies of the South East Asian Islands, vol. II. Pieridae, Danaidae, Tsukada, E. (ed), Plapac, Tokyo (In Japanese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sadaharu Morinaka
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of the AirMihama-ku, Chiba-ken, 261Japan

Personalised recommendations