Skip to main content

Towards Comparison of Decomposable Systems

  • Conference paper
Data Science, Classification, and Related Methods
  • 2015 Accesses

Summary

The paper focuses on the comparison of decomposable systems on the base of combinatorial descriptions of systems and their parts. Our system description involves the following interconnected hierarchies: a tree-like system model; criteria and restrictions for system components (nodes of the model); design alternatives (DAs) for nodes; interconnection (Is) or compatibility between DAs of different system components; estimates of DAs and Is A vector-like proximity for rankings is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arabie, Ph. and Boorman, S.A. (1973): Multidimensional Scaling of Measures of Distance between Partitions. J. of Math. Psychology, 10, 2, 148–203.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arabic, Ph. and Hubert, L.J. (1992): Combinatorial Data Analysis..donnai Review of Psychology, 43, 169–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy, J.-P., Guenoche, A. (1991): Trees and proximity Representation, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy, J.-P., Leclerc, B. and Nionjardet. B. (1986): On the Use of Ordered Sets in Problems of Comparison and Consensus of Classifications. J. of Classification, 3, 2, 17–224.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Belkin, A.R. and Levin. M.Sh. (1990): Decision Making: Combinatorial Models of Information.Approximation, Nauka Publishing House, Moscow (in Russian).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, K.P. (1973): Preference Structures I: Distance between Transitive Preference Relations. J. Math. Soc., 3, -19–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorman, S.A. and Oliver, D.C. (1973): Metrics on Spaces of Finite Trees. J. of Math. Psychology, 10, 1, 26–59.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Botafogo, R.A., Rivlin, E. and Shneiderman, B. (1992): Structural Analysis of Hypertexts: Identifying Hierarchies and Useful Metrics..4C’1,/ Trans. on Information Systems, 10, 2, 1–42–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W.D. and Kress, M. (1984): Relationships between l’ Metrics on Linear Rankings Space. SLAM J. on.1ppl. Math., 44, 1, 209–220.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Day, W.H.E. (1985): Optimal Algorithms for Comparing Trees with Labeled Leafs. J. of Classification, 2, 1, 7–28.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ganter, B. and \Ville, R. (1989): Conceptual Scaling. In Applications of Corabinatorics and Graph Theory to the Biological and Social Sciences. Roberts F.S. (ed.), 140–167, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A.D. (1986): Consensus Supertrees: The Synthesis of Rooted Trees Containing Overlapping Sets of Labeled Leafs. J. of Classification, 3, 2, 33. 5–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J.C. (1985): Measures of Similarity, Dissimilarity, and Distance. In Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, 5, S. Kotz, and N.L. Johnson (ads.), 397–405, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannenhalli, S. and Pevzner, P. (1995): Transforming (lien into,Alice, Technical Report CSE-95–012. Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, M.D., Little, C.H.C. and Penny, D. (1984): Comparing Tress with Pendant Vertices Labelled. SIAM J. on Appl. Math., 44, 5, 1054–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, L. and Arable, P. (1985): Comparing Partitions. J. of Classification, 2, 3, 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jawhari, E.M., Pouzet, M. and Missane, D. (1986): Retracts: Graphs and Ordered Sets From The Metrics Point of View. In Contemporary ItIathematics, 57, Rival, I. (ed.), AMS. Providence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, J.G. and Snell, J.L. (1972): Mathematical Models in the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. (1962): Rank Correlation Methods, 3rd ed., Hafner, New York..

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B. (1977): The relationship between multidimensional scaling and clustering. In Classification and Clustering, Van Ryzin. J. (ed.). 17–44, Academic. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemone, K.A. (1982): Similarity Measures Between Strings Extended to Sets of Strings. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 4, 3, 345–347.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M.Sh. (1988): Vector-like Criterion for Proximity of Structures. In Abstracts of The Third Conf. “Problems and Approaches of Decision Making in Organizational Management Systems”, Inst. for System Analysis, Moscow, 20–21 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M.Sh. (1996a): Towards Combinatorial Engineering of Decomposable Systems, In 13th European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems, 1, Vienna, 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M.Sh. (1996b): Hierarchical Morphological Design of Decomposable Systems. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 4, 2, 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margush, T. (1982): Distance Between Trees. Disc. Appl. Math., 4, 281–290.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mirkin, B.G. and Chernyi, L.B. (1970): On Measurement of Distance Between Partitions of a Finite Set of Units. Automation and Remote Control, 31, 786–792.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pouzet, M. and Rosenberg, I.G. (1994): General Metrics and Contracting Operations. Discrete Mathematics, 130, 1–3, 103–169.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D.F. and Foulds, L.R. (1981): Comparison of Phylogenetic Trees. Mathematical Biosciences, 53, 1 /2, 131–147.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rote, G. (1991): Computing the Minimum Hausdorff Distance between Two Point Sets on a Line under Translation. Information Processing Letters, 38, 3, 123–127.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, P.H. (1974): An Algorithm for the Distance between two Finite Sequences. J. of Combinatorial Theory, Ser. 4, 16, 253–258.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, K.-C. (1979): The Tree-to-Tree Correction Problem. J. of the.ACM, 26, 3, 422–133.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Timkovskii, V.G. (1989): Complexity of Common Subsequence and Supersequence Problems and Related Problems, English translation from Kibernetika, 5, 1–13.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Torgenson, W.S. (1958): Theory and Method of Scaling. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.A. and Fisher, M.J. (1974): The String-to-String Correction Problem. J. of the ACM, 21, 1, 168–173.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitoun, J. (1977): Trames Planes. Introduction a une etude architecturale des trames. Bordas, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Levin, M.S. (1998). Towards Comparison of Decomposable Systems. In: Hayashi, C., Yajima, K., Bock, HH., Ohsumi, N., Tanaka, Y., Baba, Y. (eds) Data Science, Classification, and Related Methods. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65950-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65950-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-70208-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-65950-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics