Advertisement

MRCP pp 21-75 | Cite as

Biliary Tract

  • Jinkan Sai
  • Joe Ariyama

Abstract

MRCP using the single-shot fast spin echo technique (RARE, HASTE, FASE, SSFSE) allows routine visualization of the normal biliary tract, including the first to third level branches of the intrahepatic bile duct, left and right hepatic ducts, and the common hepatic and common bile duct [1, 2].

Keywords

Bile Duct Common Bile Duct Cystic Duct Acute Cholecystitis Hepatic Duct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Miyazaki K, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigame T, et al (1996) MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 1297–1303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laubenberger J., Buchert M, Shneider B, et al (1995) Breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): a new method for the examination of the bile duct and pancreatic ducts. Magn Reson Med 33: 18–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sai J (1997) MR Cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary tract carcinoma at an early stage (in Japanese). J Jpn Bil Assoc 11: 151–157.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taourel P, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al (1996) Anatomic variants of the biliary tree: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 199: 521–527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sai J, Asahara S, Ariyama J, et al (1997) New diagnostic procedure of the biliary disease: MRCP, IDUS (in Japanese). Geka 59: 259–266Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Puente SG, Bannura GC (1983) Radiological anatomy of the biliary tract: variations and congenital abnormalities. World J Surg 7: 271–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shaw MJ, Dorsher PJ, Vennes JA (1993) Cystic duct anatomy: an endoscopie perspective. Am J Gastroenterol 88: 2102–2106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, et al (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165: 9–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sai J, Ariyama J, Suyama M, et al (1998) 3D-MRCP (in Japanese). J Bil Pancr 19: 197–203Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newcombe JF, Henley FA (1964) Left-sided gallbladder, A review of the literature and a report of a case associated with hepatic duct carcinoma. Arch Surg 88: 494–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sai J, Ariyama J (1997) MR cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction. In: Komi N, Funabiki T (eds) Pancreaticobiliary maljunction:s consensus and controversy. Igakutosho, Tokyo, pp 58–62Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Hoe L, Gryspeerdt S, Vanbeckevoort D, et al (1998) Normal Vaterian sphincter complex: evaluation of morphology and contractibility with dynamic single-shot MR cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170: 1497–1500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babitt DP (1969) Congenital choledochal cyst: new etiology concept based on anomalous relationships of the common bile duct and pancreatic bulb. Ann Radiol 12: 231–240Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kimura K, Ohto M, Saisho H, et al (1985) Association of gallbladder carcinoma and anomalous pancreatobiliary ductal union. Gastroenterology 89: 1258–1265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Committee of JSPBM for Diagnostic Criteria (1994) Diagnostic criteria of pancreatico-biliary maljunction. J Hep Bil Panc Surg 1: 219–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Komi N, Tamura T, Miyoshi Y, et al (1984) Nationwide survey of cases of choledochal cyst. Analysis of coexistent anomalies, complications and surgical treatment in 645 cases. Surg Gastroenterol 3: 69–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aoki H, Sugatani H, Shimizu M (1987) A clinical study on cancer of the bile duct associated with anomalous arrangements of pancreaticobiliary ductal system. Analysis of 569 cases collected in Japan (in Japanese). J Bil Tract Pancr 8: 1539–1551Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H, et al (1997) Pancreatitis: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography in children. Radiology 203: 411–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Irie H, Honda H, Jimi M, et al (1998) Value of MR cholangiopancreatography in evaluating choledochal cyst. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171: 1381–1385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matos C, Nicaise N, Deviere J, et al (1998) Choledocal cysts: comparison of findings at MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopie retrograde cholangiopancreatography in eight patients. Radiology 209: 443–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sugiyama M, Baba M, Atomi Y, et al (1998) Diagnosis of anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction: Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Surgery 123: 391–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reuther G, Kiefer B, Tuchmann A (1996) Cholangiography before biliary surgery: single shot MR Cholangiopancreatography versus intravenous cholangiography. Radiology 198: 561–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, et al (1998) Choledocholithiasis: Evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 209: 435–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, et al (1998) Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 207: 21–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bret PM, Reinhold C (1997) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography Endoscopy 29: 472–486Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moon KL Jr, Hricak H, Margulis AR, et al (1983) Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of gallstones in vitro. Radiology 148: 753–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baron EL, Shuman WP, Lee SP, et al (1989) MR appearance of gallstones in vitro at 1.5T: correlation with chemical composition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153: 497–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chan YI, Chan AC, Lam WW, et al (1996) Cholelithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 200: 85–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Park MS, Yu JS, Kim YH, et al (1998) Acute cholecystitis: comparison of MR cholangiography and US. Radiology 209: 781–785PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Regan F, Fradin J, Khazan R, et al (1996) Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167: 1441–1445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schoenfield LJ, Cary MC, Marks JW, et al (1989) Gallstones: an update. Am J Gastroenterol 84: 999–1007PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tanimura H. Uchiyama K, Ishiyama K, et al (1994) Epidemiology of Hepatolithiasis (in Japanese). JBil Tract Pancr 15: 401–408Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen MF, Jan YY, Wang CS, et al (1989) Intrahepatic stones associated with cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 84: 391–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kawarada Y, Mita T (1994) Cholangiocarcinoma associated with hepatolithiasis (in Japanese). J Bil Tract Pancr 15: 435–446Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kubo S, Hamba H, Hirohashi K, et al (1997) Magnetic resonance cholangiography in hepatolithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol 92: 629–632PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Berk JE (1940) Management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Dig Dis 7: 325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Glenn F (1976) Acute cholecystitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 143: 56–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sai J, Ariyama J, Suyama M, et al (1998) Clinical usage of MR cholangiopancreatography (in Japanese). Nippon Rinsho 56: 2768–2772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Regan F, Schaefer DC, Smith DP, et al (1998) The diagnostic utility of HASTE MRI in the evaluation of acute cholecystitis. Half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo SE. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22: 638–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rails PW, Colleti PM, Lapin SA, et al (1985) Real-time sonography in suspected acute cholecystitis. Radiology 155: 767–771Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Laing FC, Federle MP, Jefferey RB, et al (1981) Ultrasonic evaluation of patients with acute right upper quadrant pain. Radiology 140: 449–455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jutras JA, Aongtin JM, Levesque MD (1960) Hyperplastic cholecystoses. Hickey Lecture. Am J Roentgenol 83: 795–827Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fotopoulos JP, Crampton AR (1964) Adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Med Clin N Am 48: 9–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Williams I, Slavin G, Cox A, et al (1986) Diverticular disease (adenomyomatosis) of the gallbladder: a radiological-pathological survey. Br J Radiol 59: 29–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Beilby JO (1967) Diverticulosis of the gall bladder. The fundal adenoma. Br J Exp Pathol 48: 455–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ootani T, Shirai Y, Tsukada K, et al (1992) Relationship between gallbladder carcinoma and the segmental type of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Cancer 69: 2647–2652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sai J, Ariyama J, Suyama M (1997) MR cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of anomalous union of the pancreaticobiliary ducts (in Japanese). Kan Tan Sui 35: 231–235Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Jimi M, et al (1999) MR diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder and differentiation from gallbladder carcinoma: importance of showing Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172: 1535–1540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Halpert RD, Bedi DG, Tirman PJ, et al (1989) Segmental adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. Am Surg 55: 570–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    van der Vegt JH, Berk RN, Lichtenstein JE (1983) The hyperplastic cholestoses: cholesterolosis and adenomyomatosis. Radiology 146: 593–601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Koga A, Watanabe K, Fukuyama T, et al (1998) Diagnosis and operative indications for polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. Arch Surg 123: 26–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nagaiwa J (1992) Clinico-pathological study of polypoid lesion of the gallbladder (in Japanese). J Jpn Bil Ass 6: 371–379Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chijiiwa K, Sumiyoshi K, Nakayama F (1991) Impact of recent advances in hepatobiliary imaging techniques on the preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma of the gallbladder. World J Surg 15: 322–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al (1995) Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 197: 109–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sai J, Ariyama J, Suyama M, et al (1996) Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with fast advanced spin echo technique in the diagnosis of malignant obstruction of the lower biliary tract. HPB Surg 9: 433Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mizumoto R, Ogura Y, Matsuda N, et al (1990) Cooperative survey of surgical treatment for carcinoma of the biliary tract in Japan (in Japanese). J Bil Tract Pancr 11: 869–882Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sai J, Ariyama J, Suyama M, et al (1996) Early diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer with MR cholangiopancreatography. Gut 39: A184Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, et al (1995) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma — surgical anatomy and curative resection. J Hep Bil Pancr Surg 2: 239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fulcher AS, Turner MA (1997) HASTE MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 1501–1505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, John G, et al (1997) Ampullary carcinoma: demonstration by current MR techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 7: 153–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Darweesh RMA, Thorsen MK, Dodds WJ, et al (1988) Computed tomography examination of periampullary neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12: 36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mirizzi PL (1948) Sindrome del conducto hepatico. J Int Chir 8: 731–777Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Clemmett AR, Lowman RM (1965) The roentgen feature of the Mirizzi syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 94: 480483Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sai J, Ariyama J (1999) MRCP in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases: its progression and limitation. Jpn J Gastroenterol 96: 259–265Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, et al (1997) Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 205: 523–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    La Russo NF, Wiesner RH, Ludwig J, et al (1984) Primary sclerosing cholangitis. N Engl J Med 310: 899–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Stockbr,gger RW, Olsson R, Jaup B, et al (1988) Forty-six patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Radiological bile duct changes in relationship to clinical course and concomitant inflammatory bowel disease. Hepatogastroenterology 35: 289–294Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    MacCarty RL, LaRusso NF, Wiesner RH, et al (1983) Primary sclerosing cholangitis: findings on cholangiography and pancreatography. Radiology 149: 39–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Gulliver DJ, Baker ME, Putnam W, et al (1991) Bile duct diverticula and webs: nonspecific cholangiographic features of primary sclerosing cholangitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157: 281–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rohrmann CA Jr, Baron RL (1989) Biliary complications of pancreatitis. Radiol Clin N Am 27: 93–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sarles H (1978) Cholestasis and lesions of the biliary tract in chronic pancreatitis. Gut 19: 851–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Petrozza JA, Dutta SK, Latham PS, et al (1984) Prevalence and natural history of distal common bile duct stenosis in alcoholic pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 29: 890–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Corazziari E, Funch-Jensen P, Hogan WJ, et al (1993) Functional disorders of the biliary tract. Gastroenterol Int 6: 129–144Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Colcock BP (1958) Stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi. Surg Clin N Am 38: 631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Catell RB, Colcock BP, Pollack JL (1957) Stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi. N Engl J Med 256: 429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Manier JW, Cohen WN, Printen KJ (1974) Dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi in a postcholecystectomy patient. Am J Gastroenterol 62: 148–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Paulino F, Cavalcanti A (1960) Anatomy and pathology of the distal common bile duct. Special reference to stenotic odditis. Am J Dig Dis 5: 697–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, et al (1997) Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203: 435–441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ghahremani GG, Crampton AR, Benstein JR, et al (1991) Iatrogenic biliary tract complications: radiologic features and clinical significance. Radiographics 11: 441–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ghahremani GG (1994) Postsurgical and traumatic lesions of the biliary tract. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, Laufer I (eds) Text book of gastrointestinal radiology. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1762–1778Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Coakley FV, Schwartz LH, Blumgart LH, et al (1998) Complex postcholecystectomy biliary disorders: preliminary experience with evaluation by means of breath-hold MR cholangiography. Radiology 209: 141–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hadjis NS, Collier NA, Blumgart LH (1985) Malignant masquerade at the hilum of the liver. Br J Surg 72: 659–661Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bismuth H, Franco D, Corlette MB, et al (1978) Long term results of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146: 161–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al (1997) MR cholangiography in the examination of patients with biliaryenteric anastomoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169: 807–811PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Mckee JD, Raju GPR, Edelman RR, et al (1997) MR cholangiopancreatography ( MRCP) in diagnosis of afferent loop syndrome presenting as cholangitis. Dig Dis Sci 42: 2082–2086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sho M, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, et al (1998) A new evaluation of pancreatic function after pancreatoduodenectomy using secretin magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Am J Surg 176: 279–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Fulcher AS, Turner MA (1998) Pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22: 845–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    David V, Reinhold C, Hochman M, et al (1998) Pitfalls in the interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170: 1055–1059PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Hricak H, Filly RA, Margulis AR, et al (1983) Work in progress: nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the gallbladder. Radiology 147: 481–484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Demas BE, Hricak H, Moseley M, et al (1985) Gallbladder bile: an experimental study in dogs using MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 157: 453–455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Loftin TG, Simeone JF, Mueller PR, et al (1985) Gallbladder bile in cholecystitis: in vitro MR evaluation. Radiology 157: 457–459Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al (1996) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 110: 589–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Shiratori Y, et al (1999) Potential pitfall of MR cholangiopancreatography: right hepatic artery impression of the common hepatic duct. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23: 60–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al (1995) MR cholangiopancreatography: findings on 3D fast spin-echo imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165: 1397–1401PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinkan Sai
    • 1
  • Joe Ariyama
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyJuntendo UniversityBunkyo-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations