Advertisement

Keywords

Compressive Strength Cortical Bone Trabecular Bone Bone Mineral Content Cancellous Bone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference(s)

  1. Tamatsu Y (1994) A measurement of local elastic modulus of buccal compact bone of the human mandible. Jpn J Oral Bio! 36: 306–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Tamatsu Y (1994) A measurement of local elastic modulus of buccal compact bone of the human mandible. Jpn J Oral Biol 36: 306–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Tamatsu Y (1994) A measurement of local elastic modulus of buccal compact bone of the human mandible. Jpn J Oral Biol 36: 306–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Tamatsu Y (1994) A measurement of local elastic modulus of buccal compact bone of the human mandible. Jpn J Oral Biol 36: 306–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Tamatsu Y (1994) A measurement of local elastic modulus of buccal compact bone of the human mandible. Jpn J Oral Biol 36: 306–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Snyder SM, Schneider E (1991) Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9: 422–431 (with permission)Google Scholar
  7. Ferretti JL, Capozza RF, Mondelo N, Zanchetta JR (1993) Interrelationships between densitometric, geometric, and mechanical properties of rat femora: inferences concerning mechanical regulation of bone modeling. J Bone Miner Res 8: 1389–1396 (with permission)Google Scholar
  8. Borders S, Petersen KR, Orne D (1977) Prediction of bending strength of long bones from measurements of bending stiffness and bone mineral content. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng 99: 40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Indrekvam K, Husby OS, Gjerdet NR, Engester LB, Langeland N (1991) Age-dependent mechanical properties of rat femur: measured in vivo and in vitro. Acta Orthop Scand 62: 248–252 (with permission)Google Scholar
  10. Torzilli PA, Takebe K, Burstein AH, Heiple KG (1981) Structural properties of immature canine bone. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng 103: 232–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Alho A, Husby T, Hoiseth A (1988) Bone mineral content and mechanical strength. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227: 292–297 (with permission)Google Scholar
  12. Lotz JC, Gerhart TN, Hayes WC (1991) Mechanical properties of metaphyseal bone in the proximal femur. J Biomech 24: 317–329 (with permission)Google Scholar
  13. Vahey JW, Lewis JL, Vanderby R Jr (1987) Elastic moduli, yield stress, and ultimate stress of cancellous bone in the canine proximal femur. J Biomech 20: 29–33 (with permission)Google Scholar
  14. Swartz DE, Wittenberg RH, Shea M, White III AA, Hayes WC (1991) Physical and mechanical properties of calf lumbosacral trabecular bone. J Biomech 24: 1059–1068 (with permission)Google Scholar
  15. Lang MS, Moyle DD, Berg EW, Detorie N, Gilpin AT, Pappas NJ Jr, Reynolds JC, Tkacik M, Waldron RL II (1988) Correlation of mechanical properties of vertebral trabecular bone with equivalent mineral density as measured by computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg 70A: 1531–1538 (with permission)Google Scholar
  16. Linde F, Norgaard P, Hvid I, Odgaard A, Soballe K (1991) Mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Dependency on strain rate. J Biomech 24: 803–809 (with permission)Google Scholar
  17. Esses SI, Lotz JC, Hayes WC (1989) Biomechanical properties of the proximal femur determined in vitro by single-energy quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Min Res 4: 715–722 (with permission)Google Scholar
  18. Ascenzi A, Bonucci E (1968) The compressive properties of single osteons. Anat Rec 161: 377–392 (with permission)Google Scholar
  19. Lindahl 0 (1976) Mechanical properties of dried defatted spongy bone. Acta Orthop Scand 47: 11–19 (with permission)Google Scholar
  20. Ciarelli MJ, Goldstein SA, Kuhn JL, Cody DD, Brown MB (1991) Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9: 674–682 (with permission)Google Scholar
  21. Kobayashi K, Tanabe Y, Hara T (1994) Anisotropic and nonlinear viscoelastic properties of bovine compact bone. Proc 1993 Ann Meet JSOB 15: 23–27Google Scholar
  22. Kobayashi K, Tanabe Y, Koga Y, Hara T (1993) Identification of the dynamic properties of human compact bone. Theor Appl Mech 42: 313–318Google Scholar
  23. Smith DM, Cody DD (1993) Load-bearing capacity of corticocancellous bone grafts in the spine. J Bone Joint Surg 75A: 1206–1213 (with permission)Google Scholar
  24. Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Ciarelli MJ, Matthews LS (1989) The limitations of canine trabecular bone as a model for human: a biomechanical study. J Biomech 22: 95–107 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turner CH (1989) Yield behavior of bovine cancellous bone. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng 111: 256–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Torzilli PA, Takebe K, Burstein AH, Zika JM, Heiple KG (1982) The material properties of immature bone. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng 104: 12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Britton JM, Davie MW (1990) Mechanical properties of bone from iliac crest and relationship to L5 vertebral bone. Bone 11: 21–28 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lakes R, Saha S (1980) Long-term torsional creep in compact bone. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng 102: 178–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Caler WE, Carter DR (1989) Bone creep-fatigue damage accumulation. J Biomech 22:625635 (with permission)Google Scholar
  30. Fondrk M, Bahniuk E, Davy DT, Michaels C (1988) Some viscoplastic characteristics of bovine and human cortical bone. J Biomech 21: 623–630 (with permission)Google Scholar
  31. Ramaekers JGM (1979) The dynamic shear modulus and damping of compact bovine metacarpal bone in dependence on the topography along the bone shaft. Neth J Zool 29: 151–165 (with permission)Google Scholar
  32. Ramaekers JGM (1979) The rheological behaviour of skeletal material originating from several classes of vertebrates. Neth J Zool, 29: 166–176 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Buskirk WCV, Cowin SC, Ward RN (1981) Ultrasonic measurement of orthotropic elastic constants of bovine femoral bone. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng 103: 67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lappi VG, King MS, LeMay I (1979) Determination of elastic constants for human femurs. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng 101: 193–197Google Scholar
  35. Bonefield W, Tully AE (1982) Ultrasonic analysis of the Young’s modulus of cortical bone. J Biomed Eng 4:23–27 (with permission)Google Scholar
  36. Rho JY, Ashman RB, Turner CH (1993) Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material. Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J Biomech 26: 111–119 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Carter DR, Caler WE (1983) Cycle-dependent and time-dependent bone fracture with repeated loading. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng 105: 166–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Carter DR, Caler WE, Spengler DM, Frankel VH (1981) Fatigue behavior of adult cortical bone: the influence of mean strain and strain range. Acta Orthop Scand 52: 481–490 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Michel MC, Guo XDE, Gibson LJ, McMahon TA, Hayes WC (1993) Compressive fatigue behavior of bovine trabecular bone. J Biomech 26: 453–463 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lafferty JF, Raju PVV (1979) The influence of stress frequency on the fatigue strength of cortical bone. Trans ASME J Biomech Eng 101: 112–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Carter DR, Hayes WC (1977) Compact bone fatigue damage—I. Residual strength and stiffness. J Biomech 10: 325–337 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wada Y, Tokuda M, Iwata J, Yagi K (1994) Evaluation of mechanical property of 3rd lumbar vertebral body. 43rd Nat Cong of Theor Appl Mech:647–650Google Scholar
  43. Ascenzi A, Bonucci E (1972) The shearing properties of single osteons. Anat Rec 172: 499–510 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stromberg L, Dalen N (1976) The influence of freezing on the maximum torque capacity of long bones, an experimental study on dogs. Acta Orthop Scand 47: 254–256 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Netz P Eriksson K, Stromberg L (1978) Torsional strength and geometry of diaphyseal bone: an experimental study on dogs. Acta Orthop Scand 49:430–434 (with permission)Google Scholar
  46. Jonsson U, Netz P, Stromberg L (1984) Solid mechanics and strength of bone in young dogs. Acta Orthop Scand 55: 446–451 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Bonfield W, Clark EA (1973) Elastic deformation of compact bone. J Mat Sci 8: 1590–1594 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raftopoulos D, Katsamanis E, Saul F, Liu W, Saddemi S (1993) An intermediate loading rate technique for the determination of mechanical properties of human femoral cortical bone. J Biomed Eng 15: 60–66 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Katsamanis F, Raftopoulos DD (1990) Determination of mechanical properties of human femoral cortical bone by the Hopkinson bar stress technique. J Biomech 23: 1173–1184 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Danielsen CC, Andreassen TT, Mosekilde L (1986) Mechanical properties of collagen from decalcified rat femur in relation to age and in vitro maturation. Calcif Tissue Int 39: 69–73 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Currey JD (1975) The effects of strain rate, reconstruction and mineral content on some mechanical properties of bovine bone. J Biomech 8: 81–86 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ascenzi A, Bonucci E (1967) The tensile properties of single osteons. Anat Rec 158: 375–386 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Court-Brown CM (1993) Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. J Bone Joint Surg 75A: 1193–1205 (with permission)Google Scholar
  54. Smith CB, Smith DA (1976) Relation between age, mineral density and mechanical properties of human femoral compacta. Acta Orthop Scand 47: 496–502 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Carter DR, Schwab GH, Spengler DM (1980) Tensile fracture of cancellous bone. Acta Orthop Scand 51: 733–741 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Carter DR, Hayes WC (1977) The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg 59A: 954–962 (with permission)Google Scholar
  57. Reilly DT, Burstein AH (1975) The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8: 393–405 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saha S, Hayes WC (1976) Tensile impact properties of human compact bone. J Biomech 9: 243–251 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Cezayirliogle H, Bahniuk E, Davy DT, Heiple KG (1985) Anisotropic yield behavior of bone under combined axial force and torque. J Biomech 187: 61–69 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Craig RG (1993) Restorative dental materials, 9th edn. Mosby, St Louis, p 69 (with permission)Google Scholar
  61. Craig RG, Peyton FA (1958) Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. J Dent Res 37: 710–718 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stanford JW, Weigel KV, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT (1960) Compressive properties of hard tooth tissues and some restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 60: 746–756 (with permission)Google Scholar
  63. Moroi HH, Okimoto K, Moroi R, Terada Y (1993) Numeric approach to the biomechanical analysis of thermal effects in coated implants. Int J Prosthodont 6: 564–572 (with permission)Google Scholar
  64. Stanford JW, Weigel KV, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT (1960) Compressive properties of hard tooth tissues and some restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 60: 746–756 (with permission)Google Scholar
  65. Hall DR, Nakayama WT, Grenoble DE, Katz JL (1973) Elastic constants of three representative dental cements. J Dent Res 52: 390 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hassan R, Caputo AA, Bunshah RF (1981) Fracture toughness of human enamel. J Dent Res 60: 820–827 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Craig RG, Peyton FA (1958) The microhardness of enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 37: 661–668 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Oka H, Yamamoto T, Saratani K, Kawazoe T (1989) Application of mechanical mobility of periodontal tissues to tooth mobility examination. Med Biol Eng Comput 27: 75–81 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Noyes DH, Solt CW (1973) Measurement of mechanical mobility of human incisors with sinusoidal forces. J Biomech 6: 439–442 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith DC, Cooper WEG (1971) The determination of shear strength — a method using a micro-punch apparatus. Brit Dent J 130: 333–337 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Bowen RL, Rodriguez MS (1962) Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Amer Dent Assoc 64: 378–387 (with permission)Google Scholar
  72. Rasmussen ST, Patchin RE, Scott DB, Heuer AH (1976) Fracture properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 55: 154–164 (with permission)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroyuki Abé
    • 1
  • Kozaburo Hayashi
    • 2
  • Masaaki Sato
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Machine Intelligence and Systems Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringTohoku UniversityAoba-ku, SendaiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering ScienceOsaka UniversityToyonaka, Osaka, 560Japan
  3. 3.Department of Mechatronics and Precision Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringTohoku UniversityAoba-ku, SendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations